California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. A.L. Gilbert Company

Filing 21

ORDER EXTENDING the Time for Defendants to Respond to the Complaint 20 . Defendant shall have up to and including August 10, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/4/2015. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a California
Non-Profit Corporation,
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00533---SKO
ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 20)

13
14
15
16
17

A.L. GILBERT COMPANY, a California
Corporation,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
The Complaint by Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance was filed on April

18 6, 2015, and served on Defendant A.L. Gilbert Company on July 5, 2015, with an answer due on
19 July 27, 2015. (See Docs. 1; 10.) The parties stipulated to a seven day extension of time for
20 Defendant to file its response, with an answer due on August 3, 2015. (Doc. 10.)
21

On July 20, 2015, Defendant filed notice of its desire not to consent to the jurisdiction of a

22 U.S. Magistrate Judge. (Docs. 13; 16.) On July 28, 2015, the parties participated in a Case
23 Management Conference, and Defendant requested additional time to reconsider whether it wished
24 to consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. A further Case Management Conference was set for
25 August 10, 2015, to provide Defendant with additional time to decide whether it wished to consent
26 to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (Docs. 18; 19.)
27

The parties have stipulated to a further seven day extension of time for Defendant to file its

28 response to the Complaint, so Defendant can determine whether it will consent to Magistrate

1 Judge jurisdiction prior to filing its response to the Complaint. This is the second extension of
2 Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint, for a total extension period of fourteen days. (Doc.
3 20.) This extension does not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court
4 order. (See Doc. 20.)
5

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation and, good cause appearing, Defendant shall

6 have up to and including August 10, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

August 4, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2