Ortiz et al v. Alvarez et al
ORDER Continuing Settlement Conference as to Plaintiffs Alsonso Padron and Elida Padron signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 07/27/2017. Settlement Conference set for 8/15/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.(Flores, E)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SANDRA ORTIZ, et al.,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00535-DAD-EPG
ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE AS TO PLAINTIFFS
ALFONSO PADRON AND ELIDA
GERARDO ALVAREZ, et al.,
On July 26, 2017, the undersigned conducted a settlement conference in the above
18 entitled action. The Court shall continue the settlement conference as to Plaintiffs Alfonso
19 Padron and Elida Padron to August 15, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9.
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case
21 shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full
22 authority to negotiate and settle the case on any terms at the conference.
Confidential Settlement Conference Statement: Plaintiff shall submit a Confidential
24 Settlement Conference Statement directly to Judge Boone’s chambers by e-mail to
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
26 subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented
by a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly
27 involved in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative
shall have the authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing
28 party's most recent demand.
1 SABOrders@caed.uscourts.gov. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court
2 nor served on any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement
3 Conference Statement. The statement shall be clearly marked “confidential” with the date and
4 time of the Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon
which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of
prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in
A summary of the proceedings to date.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and
The relief sought.
The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a
history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
The Court will vacate the settlement conference if the Court finds the settlement
18 conference will be neither productive nor meaningful to attempt to resolve all or part of this case.
19 As far in advance of the settlement conference as possible, a party shall inform the Court and
20 other parties that it believes the case is not in a settlement posture so the Court may vacate or
21 reset the settlement conference.
Otherwise the parties shall proceed with the settlement
22 conference in good faith to attempt to resolve all or part of the case.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
CONTINUED to August 15, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9;
The settlement conference for Plaintiffs Alfonso Padron and Elida Padron is
Plaintiffs Alfonso Padron and Elida Padron and Defendants Gerardo Alvarez,
Parlier Unified School District, Youth Centers of America, and Israel Lara
SHALL personally appear at the August 15, 2017 settlement conference; and
Plaintiffs Alfonso Padron and Elida Padron SHALL submit a confidential
settlement statement in compliance with this order by close of business on August
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 27, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?