Ortiz et al v. Alvarez et al
Filing
129
ORDER Terminating Martha Moreno as Plaintiff on the Docket signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/12/2017. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
S. ORTIZ, et al.,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00535-DAD-EPG
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
GERARDO ALVAREZ, et al.,
ORDER TERMINATING MARTHA
MORENO AS PLAINTIFF ON THE
DOCKET
(ECF No. 128)
Defendants.
14
15
On September 8, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice the claims
16
in this action of Plaintiff Martha Moreno. (ECF No. 128). All parties have agreed to the
17
dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the claims of Martha Moreno are dismissed with
18
prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th
19
Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has
20
filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of
21
dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate
22
23
MARTHA MORENO on the docket as a plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated:
September 12, 2017
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?