Ortiz et al v. Alvarez et al

Filing 129

ORDER Terminating Martha Moreno as Plaintiff on the Docket signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 09/12/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

S. ORTIZ, et al.,

Case No. 1:15-cv-00535-DAD-EPG
Plaintiff,

11
v.

12
13

GERARDO ALVAREZ, et al.,

ORDER TERMINATING MARTHA
MORENO AS PLAINTIFF ON THE
DOCKET
(ECF No. 128)

Defendants.

14
15

On September 8, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice the claims
16
in this action of Plaintiff Martha Moreno. (ECF No. 128). All parties have agreed to the
17
dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the claims of Martha Moreno are dismissed with
18
prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th
19

Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has

20
filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of
21

dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to terminate

22
23

MARTHA MORENO on the docket as a plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated:

September 12, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1