Williams v. King et al

Filing 31

ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Answer 30 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/20/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 COREY WILLIAMS, 8 Plaintiff, 9 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER v. 10 Case No. 1:15-cv-00543-SKO (PC) DeLEON, et al., (Doc. 30) 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff, Corey Williams, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 13 14 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. On October 31, 2017, Defendants filed their 15 Answer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 27.) On November 16, 2017, Plaintiff 16 filed an answer to Defendants’ Answer. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiff does not have a right to file a 17 response/surreply to Defendants’ Answer under the Local Rules or the Federal Rules of Civil 18 Procedure. Therefore, Plaintiff=s Answer to Defendants’ Answer, filed on November 16, 2017, 19 (Doc. 30), is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record. 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sheila K. Oberto 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?