Purtue v. Kearnes et al

Filing 26

SECOND ORDER directing service by U.S. Marshal on Defendant D. Magallance re 18 , 23 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/16/2016. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL PURTUE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. B. KEARNES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 [ECF Nos. 18, 23] The Marshal was not able to locate Defendant D. Magallance and service was returned unexecuted on October 21, 2016. On October 24, 2016, the Court issued an order to show cause why Defendant Magallance 21 22 SECOND ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL ON DEFENDANT D. MAGALLANCE pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 20 Case No.: 1:15-cv-00551-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Michael Purtue is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) should be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (ECF No. 19.) 23 Plaintiff filed a response to the order to show cause on November 14, 2016. (ECF No. 23.) 24 The Court will hereby direct re-service as to Defendant D. Magallance by the United States 25 Marshal. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the following documents on the 3 United States Marshal: 4 a. The Court’s July 28, 2016 service order (ECF No. 11); 5 b. A copy of the USM-285 forms as to Defendant D. Magallances (ECF No. 18); 6 c. A copy of the response to the order to show cause filed by Plaintiff to assist the United States Marshal with service (ECF No. 23); and 7 2. 8 All provisions of the Court’s July 28, 2016, order remain in full force and effect 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 12 November 16, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?