Purtue v. Kearnes et al
ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Filed December 21, 2016, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/24/17. Twenty One Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
B. KEARNES, et al.,
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
AMEND FILED DECEMBER 21, 2016
[ECF No. 35]
Plaintiff Michael Purtue is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On December 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and
submitted a proposed third amended complaint which was lodged by the Court. (ECF Nos. 35, 36.)
Defendants have not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. Local
Rule 230(l). Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order,
Defendants shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for leave to
amend the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 24, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?