Purtue v. Kearnes et al

Filing 44

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Filed December 21, 2016, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/24/17. Twenty One Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL PURTUE, 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 v. B. KEARNES, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND FILED DECEMBER 21, 2016 [ECF No. 35] Plaintiff Michael Purtue is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 16 On December 21, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and 17 submitted a proposed third amended complaint which was lodged by the Court. (ECF Nos. 35, 36.) 18 Defendants have not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. Local 19 Rule 230(l). Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order, 20 Defendants shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for leave to 21 amend the complaint. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?