Purtue v. Kearnes et al

Filing 75

ORDER Adopting 41 Findings and Recommendations and Denying 37 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/11/17. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL PURTUE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:15-cv-00551-DAD-SAB

v.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION

G. EBERLE, et al.,

15

Defendants.
(Doc. Nos. 37, 41)

16

Plaintiff Michael Purtue is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

17
18

action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

19
20

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 4, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued

21

findings and recommendations which were served on the parties and contained notice that

22

objections were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day period has expired and no objections

23

to the findings and recommendations were filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has

24
25

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

undersigned concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by

27

proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly,

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed on January 4, 2017 (Doc. No. 41) are adopted

3
4

in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction filed on December 22, 2016 (Doc. No.

5

37) is denied.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

Dated:

May 11, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2