Reamel v. Harrington et al

Filing 31

ORDER for Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why he Should Not be Sanctioned for Failure to Appear, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/18/17. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 Case No. 1:15-cv-00553-LJO-EPG (PC) REAMEL CURTIS, Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR v. J. GONZALES and J. BURGARIN, 9 Defendants. 10 11 12 Reamel Curtis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 13 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. An Initial Scheduling Conference 14 was held on April 18, 2017 at 2pm. This conference was set in a minute order dated December 15 22, 2016, which was served on Plaintiff by mail. 16 appeared on behalf of Defendants. Plaintiff failed to appear. Mr. Hennes contacted the 17 litigation coordinator at California State Prison, Sacramento, where Plaintiff is currently 18 housed. According to Mr. Hennes, the litigation coordinator informed him that Plaintiff never 19 requested the conference be put on the calendar. Counsel Lucas Hennes telephonically 20 Accordingly, Plaintiff IS ORDERED to show cause why he should not be sanctioned 21 for failing to appear at the Initial Scheduling Conference. Plaintiff may either show cause in 22 writing prior to the continued Initial Scheduling Conference (which is scheduled for May 2, 23 2017, at 2:00 p.m.) or orally at the continued Initial Scheduling Conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: April 18, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?