Praetorian Insurance Company v. Western Milling, LLC

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/1/15 ORDERING the parties agree that Defendant will file its responsive pleading by December 7, 2015; The parties will meet and file a Joint Scheduling Conference Statement no later than December 16, 2015. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP James P. Wagoner, #58553 jim.wagoner@mccormickbarstow.com Lejf E. Knutson, #234203 lejf.knutson@mccormickbarstow.com 7647 North Fresno Street Fresno, California 93720 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Attorneys for Defendant, WESTERN MILLING LLC 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. WESTERN MILLING LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant. 17 18 21 For All Purposes Assigned To: Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., Dispositive & Discovery Motions Only Assigned To Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean SUPPLEMENTAL STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE PLEADING Complaint Filed: April 10, 2015 19 20 CASE NO.: 1:15-cv-00557-MCE-GSA WHEREAS the parties to this action previously stipulated to stay of this action to explore resolving this matter informally; 22 WHEREAS the Court issued an order staying the action to October 31, 2015 and requiring 23 Defendant to file a responsive pleading by November 23, 2015 if the parties had not resolved the 24 dispute; 25 WHEREAS Defendant has prepared for filing a counter-claim which refers to materials 26 previously designated by the parties as “confidential”, potentially requiring Defendant to file its 27 counter-claim under seal; 28 30 31 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE CASE NO.: 1:15-cv-00557-MCE-GSA PLEADING 93232-00043 3678361.1 1 WHEREAS the parties are meeting and conferring on whether the specific information 2 referenced in the counter-claim should still be designated confidential and thereby require the cross- 3 complaint to be filed under seal. 4 WHEREAS the parties previously asked the Court to extend the previous filing deadline from 5 November 23, 2015 to November 30, 2015 so that the parties could complete their meet and confer 6 attempts. 7 8 WHEREAS the Court extended the previous filing deadline from November 23, 2015 to November 30, 2015 in conformity with the parties’ request. 9 WHEREAS counsel for Praetorian Insurance Company has not been able to complete 10 conferring with his client sufficiently in advance of the November 30, 2015 filing deadline due to 11 delays caused by the holiday season. 12 13 WHEREAS, subject to the Court issuing an order consistent with the terms of this stipulation, the parties, by and between their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 14 15 1. The parties agree that Defendant will file its responsive pleading by December 7, 2015; 16 2. The parties will meet and file a Joint Scheduling Conference Statement no later than 17 December 16, 2015. 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 30 93232-00043 3678361.1 31 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE CASE NO.: 1:15-cv-00557-MCE-GSA PLEADING 1 2 Dated: November 25, 2015 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 3 4 By: __/s/ James P. Wagoner_____________ James P. Wagoner Attorneys for Defendant WESTERN MILLING, LLC. 5 6 7 Dated: November 25, 2015 SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP 8 By: /s/ Gary R. Selvin Gary R. Selvin Nancy J. Strout Attorneys for Plaintiff PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY 9 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2015 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 31 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING A RESPONSIVE CASE NO.: 1:15-cv-00557-MCE-GSA PLEADING 93232-00043 3678361.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?