Flores v. Dodson et al

Filing 13

Second STIPULATION to Extend Defendants Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; ORDER - that Defendants GLENN DODSON and LINDA J. DODSON's response to the Complaint be filed no later than July 2, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from July 23, 2015 to August 25, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe in Courtroom 8 (BAM). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/16/2015. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 KEITH M. WHITE #188536 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP Attorneys at Law 499 West Shaw, Suite 116 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 248-4820 Facsimile: (559) 248-4830 Attorneys for Defendants, GLENN DODSON and LINDA J. DODSON TANYA E. MOORE #206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone: (408) 298-2000 Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiff, OSCAR FLORES 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OSCAR FLORES, v. 17 19 1:15-cv-00570---BAM Plaintiff(s), 16 18 NO. GLENN DODSON; LINDA J. DODSON; JASVIR SINGH SOHAL dba KWIK KORNER, 20 Defendant(s). 21 SECOND STIPULATIONTO EXTEND DEFENDANTS GLENN DODSON AND LINDA J. DODSON’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER Complaint Served: April 22, 2015 Current Response Date: June 10, 2015 New Response Date: July 2, 2015 22 23 WHEREAS, the responsive pleading of Defendants, Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson 24 (hereinafter “Dodsons”), was due on June 10, 2015, as the result of a stipulation which extended 25 their deadline to respond by not more than 28 days; 26 WHEREAS, the scheduling conference in this matter is currently set for July 23, 2015; 27 /// 28 /// 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Oscar Flores (Flores), and Dodsons wish additional time to 2 attempt resolution of the matter without incurring fees and costs associated with filing 3 responsive pleadings ; 4 5 WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve the Court’s resources and time and not unnecessarily burden the Court with a matter that will likely be informally resolved; 6 WHEREAS, a brief extension of time is necessary in order to complete the terms of the 7 settlement between the parties and it is likely that the case will settle without further use of the 8 Court’s resources and time; 9 10 WHEREAS, the extension granted in this Stipulation will not affect or change any of the currently scheduled Court dates in this case. 11 NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff, Oscar Flores, through his attorney of record, and 12 Defendants, Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson, through their attorney of record, hereby 13 stipulate as follows: 14 1. That Defendants’ Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson’s time to respond to the 15 Complaint be extended to July 2, 2015, which extension exceeds 28 days from the initial 16 deadline. 17 Dated: June 15, 2015 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 18 By:____/s/ Keith M. White______________ KEITH M. WHITE Attorneys for Defendant, GLENN DODSON and LINDA J. DODSON 19 20 21 22 Dated: June 15, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 23 24 25 26 27 28 By:___/s/ Tanya E. Moore_____________ TANYA E. MOORE Attorneys for Plaintiff OSCAR FLORES ORDER 1 2 3 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants GLENN DODSON and LINDA J. 5 DODSON’s response to the Complaint be filed no later than July 2, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from 6 7 July 23, 2015 to August 25, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 16, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?