Flores v. Dodson et al
Filing
13
Second STIPULATION to Extend Defendants Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; ORDER - that Defendants GLENN DODSON and LINDA J. DODSON's response to the Complaint be filed no later than July 2, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from July 23, 2015 to August 25, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe in Courtroom 8 (BAM). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/16/2015. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 248-4820
Facsimile: (559) 248-4830
Attorneys for Defendants, GLENN DODSON
and LINDA J. DODSON
TANYA E. MOORE #206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone: (408) 298-2000
Facsimile: (408) 298-6046
Attorneys for Plaintiff, OSCAR FLORES
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
OSCAR FLORES,
v.
17
19
1:15-cv-00570---BAM
Plaintiff(s),
16
18
NO.
GLENN DODSON; LINDA J. DODSON;
JASVIR SINGH SOHAL dba KWIK
KORNER,
20
Defendant(s).
21
SECOND STIPULATIONTO EXTEND
DEFENDANTS GLENN DODSON AND
LINDA J. DODSON’S DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT; ORDER
Complaint Served: April 22, 2015
Current Response Date: June 10, 2015
New Response Date: July 2, 2015
22
23
WHEREAS, the responsive pleading of Defendants, Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson
24
(hereinafter “Dodsons”), was due on June 10, 2015, as the result of a stipulation which extended
25
their deadline to respond by not more than 28 days;
26
WHEREAS, the scheduling conference in this matter is currently set for July 23, 2015;
27
///
28
///
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Oscar Flores (Flores), and Dodsons wish additional time to
2
attempt resolution of the matter without incurring fees and costs associated with filing
3
responsive pleadings ;
4
5
WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve the Court’s resources and time and not
unnecessarily burden the Court with a matter that will likely be informally resolved;
6
WHEREAS, a brief extension of time is necessary in order to complete the terms of the
7
settlement between the parties and it is likely that the case will settle without further use of the
8
Court’s resources and time;
9
10
WHEREAS, the extension granted in this Stipulation will not affect or change any of the
currently scheduled Court dates in this case.
11
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff, Oscar Flores, through his attorney of record, and
12
Defendants, Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson, through their attorney of record, hereby
13
stipulate as follows:
14
1.
That Defendants’ Glenn Dodson and Linda J. Dodson’s time to respond to the
15
Complaint be extended to July 2, 2015, which extension exceeds 28 days from the initial
16
deadline.
17
Dated: June 15, 2015
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
18
By:____/s/ Keith M. White______________
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendant,
GLENN DODSON and LINDA J. DODSON
19
20
21
22
Dated: June 15, 2015
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
23
24
25
26
27
28
By:___/s/ Tanya E. Moore_____________
TANYA E. MOORE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OSCAR FLORES
ORDER
1
2
3
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants GLENN DODSON and LINDA J.
5
DODSON’s response to the Complaint be filed no later than July 2, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from
6
7
July 23, 2015 to August 25, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 16, 2015
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?