Torres v. Gutierrez et al
Filing
26
NOTICE of This Court's Expedited Trial Setting Procedures Upon Consent of All Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/13/2016. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GUSTAVO TORRES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 1:15-cv-00575 DLB
NOTICE OF THIS COURT’S EXPEDITED
TRIAL SETTING PROCEDURES UPON
CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES
ARRELLANO et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Due to the extraordinarily high case load of the district court judges in this district, trials
17
18
in civil rights actions concerning prison conditions are often conducted by United States
19
Magistrate Judges with the consent of all the parties. A trial conducted by a magistrate judge is
20
far more likely to proceed on a scheduled trial date. Presently, when a civil trial is set before a
21
district judge, any criminal trial which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the
22
civil trial date was set first. Thus, a civil trial set before a district judge is often trailed day to day
23
or week to week until the completion of the matter occupying the district court. Consenting to the
24
jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes will generally expedite the resolution of an
25
action.
26
The parties are therefore reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge
27
to conduct all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to
28
conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of
1
1
Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States
2
Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
3
If all parties in this action consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge,
4
this Court will immediately schedule a trial setting hearing. The Court will proceed as follows at
5
the trial setting hearing:
6
1.
Set the matter for trial on a date certain before this Court. Generally, the trial date
7
will be scheduled for a date approximately six months after the deadline for the filing of
8
dispositive motions;1 and
9
2.
By agreement of the parties, vacate any previously set deadlines, such as
10
dispositive motion deadlines, if the parties stipulate that such deadlines are unnecessary and the
11
parties desire to proceed to trial expeditiously after the closing of the discovery deadlines.
12
Consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern
13
District, if the matter proceeds to trial under this process, the Court will handle the trial just as
14
any other civil case which comes before the Court.
15
Withholding consent or declining jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all
16
purposes will have no effect on the merits of a party’s case or have any adverse substantive
17
consequences.2 A party may also consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction at any time, even if the
18
party has previously declined such jurisdiction.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated:
21
January 13, 2016
/s/ Dennis
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
See Court’s Discovery and Scheduling Order for dispositive motion deadlines. Setting a trial
date approximately six months after the deadline affords a period for a response/reply to the
dispositive motion, and consideration of the motion by the court; if claims remain after a decision
on the dispositive motion, a schedule will be set for motions in limine, pre-trial statements,
motions for incarcerated witnesses, and motions for payment of unincarcerated witness fees, all
prior to the first day of trial.
2
Even if the parties decline consent, under Local Rule 302 the assigned magistrate judge will still
conduct a number of pretrial matters.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?