Torres v. Gutierrez et al

Filing 26

NOTICE of This Court's Expedited Trial Setting Procedures Upon Consent of All Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/13/2016. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUSTAVO TORRES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 1:15-cv-00575 DLB NOTICE OF THIS COURT’S EXPEDITED TRIAL SETTING PROCEDURES UPON CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES ARRELLANO et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Due to the extraordinarily high case load of the district court judges in this district, trials 17 18 in civil rights actions concerning prison conditions are often conducted by United States 19 Magistrate Judges with the consent of all the parties. A trial conducted by a magistrate judge is 20 far more likely to proceed on a scheduled trial date. Presently, when a civil trial is set before a 21 district judge, any criminal trial which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the 22 civil trial date was set first. Thus, a civil trial set before a district judge is often trailed day to day 23 or week to week until the completion of the matter occupying the district court. Consenting to the 24 jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes will generally expedite the resolution of an 25 action. 26 The parties are therefore reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge 27 to conduct all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to 28 conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of 1 1 Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States 2 Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. 3 If all parties in this action consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, 4 this Court will immediately schedule a trial setting hearing. The Court will proceed as follows at 5 the trial setting hearing: 6 1. Set the matter for trial on a date certain before this Court. Generally, the trial date 7 will be scheduled for a date approximately six months after the deadline for the filing of 8 dispositive motions;1 and 9 2. By agreement of the parties, vacate any previously set deadlines, such as 10 dispositive motion deadlines, if the parties stipulate that such deadlines are unnecessary and the 11 parties desire to proceed to trial expeditiously after the closing of the discovery deadlines. 12 Consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern 13 District, if the matter proceeds to trial under this process, the Court will handle the trial just as 14 any other civil case which comes before the Court. 15 Withholding consent or declining jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all 16 purposes will have no effect on the merits of a party’s case or have any adverse substantive 17 consequences.2 A party may also consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction at any time, even if the 18 party has previously declined such jurisdiction. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: 21 January 13, 2016 /s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 See Court’s Discovery and Scheduling Order for dispositive motion deadlines. Setting a trial date approximately six months after the deadline affords a period for a response/reply to the dispositive motion, and consideration of the motion by the court; if claims remain after a decision on the dispositive motion, a schedule will be set for motions in limine, pre-trial statements, motions for incarcerated witnesses, and motions for payment of unincarcerated witness fees, all prior to the first day of trial. 2 Even if the parties decline consent, under Local Rule 302 the assigned magistrate judge will still conduct a number of pretrial matters. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?