Garza v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/6/16. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Young Cho Attorney at Law: 189870 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-5491 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Ramon Garza 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 RAMON GARZA, 15 Plaintiff, 16 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 18 19 Defendant. ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-00584-EPG ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 22 23 TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Ramon Garza (“Plaintiff”) 24 and Carolyn W. Colvin as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security 25 (“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its 26 own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to -1- 1 the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B), requiring no separate 2 order of the Court. 3 DATE: January 5, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 4 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 5 /s/ Young Cho BY: __________________ Young Cho Attorney for plaintiff Ramon Garza 6 7 8 DATE: January 5, 2016 9 10 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Lynn M. Harada 11 Lynn M. Harada Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER Based on the above stipulation, the above captioned matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?