Garza v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
ORDER on Stipulation for Dismissal, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 1/6/16. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Young Cho
Attorney at Law: 189870
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ramon Garza
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
RAMON GARZA,
15
Plaintiff,
16
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
17
18
19
Defendant.
) Case No.: 1:15-cv-00584-EPG
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL;
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
20
21
22
23
TO THE HONORABLE ERICA P. GROSJEAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Ramon Garza (“Plaintiff”)
24
and Carolyn W. Colvin as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security
25
(“Defendant”), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its
26
own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to
-1-
1
the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B), requiring no separate
2
order of the Court.
3
DATE: January 5, 2016
Respectfully submitted,
4
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
5
/s/ Young Cho
BY: __________________
Young Cho
Attorney for plaintiff Ramon Garza
6
7
8
DATE: January 5, 2016
9
10
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
/s/ Lynn M. Harada
11
Lynn M. Harada
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
(Per e-mail authorization)
12
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
Based on the above stipulation, the above captioned matter is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 6, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?