Gaines v. CA Dept. of Corrections, et al.

Filing 30

ORDER Modifying 28 Discovery and Scheduling Order; Granting Defendant's 29 Motion, signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/9/16. (Gonzalez, R)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THURMAN GAINES,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00587-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER MODIFYING
SCHEDULING and PLANNING ORDER

vs.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 29 Defendant E. Horowitz has moved for an extension of time within
which to to make initial disclosures under Rule 16(b) and to file a motion for summary
judgment based upon the failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For good cause
shown, the Scheduling and Planning Order at Docket 26 is hereby modified as follows:
The parties are hereby granted through and including Monday, November 7, 2016, within
which to (1) make the disclosures required under Rule 26(a)(1); and (2) motions dealing
with the failure to exhaust administrative remedies, jurisdiction and venue.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of September, 2016.
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING & PLAN NING ORDER