Crain v. City of Atwater et al
Filing
35
ORDER to Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions should not Issue signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/10/2017. Show Cause Response due by 1/17/2017; Show Cause Hearing set for 1/19/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANNY CRAIN,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. 1:15-cv-00591-DAD-BAM
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE
CITY OF ATWATER, ATWATER
POLICE DEPARTMENT, FRANK
PIETRO, DAVID WALKER, and JOSE
TORRES,
Defendants.
On December 13, 2016, defendants filed a notice of motion and motion for summary
19
judgment in this action, noticing the motion for hearing on January 17, 2017. (Doc. No. 33.) The
20
opposing party to such a motion must file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to
21
the motion no less than fourteen (14) days prior to the noticed hearing date. See Local Rule
22
230(c). Plaintiff has filed neither.
23
Therefore, plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to show cause in writing by January 17, 2017, as
24
to why sanctions should not be imposed due to his failure to file either an opposition or a
25
statement of non-opposition to the pending motion for summary judgment. See Chambers v.
26
NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 42–46 (1991) (holding it is within the inherent authority of the courts
27
to control their docket and require compliance with their orders). A hearing on this order to show
28
cause regarding sanctions will be held on January 19, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom Five,
1
1
Robert E. Coyle Federal Building, 2500 Tulare St., Fresno, California before the
2
undersigned. Counsel for the defendants, in particular, are encouraged to appear telephonically at
3
the hearing on the order to show cause.
4
At this time, the hearing on defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment set for
5
January 17, 2017 is vacated. Following the January 19, 2017 hearing on the order to show cause,
6
the court will reset the hearing on defendants’ motion for summary judgment if appropriate. See
7
Local Rule 230(g).
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
January 10, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?