Johnson v. On Habeas Corpus
Filing
40
ORDER requiring Petitioner to submit signed Declaration signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/2/2016. ( Filing Deadline: 5/26/2016.) (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
Case No. 1:16-cv-00600 MJS (HC)
CARLOS G. SANCHEZ,
13
14
ORDER REQUIRING PETITIONER TO
Petitioner, SUBMIT SIGNED DECLARATION
v.
15
16
17
S. FRAUENHEIM,
Respondent.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Upon examination of the petition, the Court has discovered that the petition does
not contain an original signature. Local Rule 131 requires a document submitted to the
Court for filing to include an original signature. In addition, Rule 2(c)(5) of the Rules
24
Governing Section 2254 Cases requires a petition for writ of habeas corpus to “be
25
signed under penalty of perjury by the petitioner.”
26
27
In light of the difficulty in having Petitioner submit a new habeas corpus petition,
Petitioner is ordered to submit a document stating that he submitted the instant petition
28
1
1
to the Court and sign it under penalty of perjury. The document must contain an original
2
signature. Petitioner is granted twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order to
3
comply with the Court’s directive.
4
5
Petitioner is forewarned that failure to comply with a Court order will result in
dismissal of the petition pursuant to Local Rule 110.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 2, 2016
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?