Altamirano et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Scheduling Conference from 8/10/2015 to 9/29/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A joint scheduling report is due one week before the new conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/4/2015. (Hernandez, M)

1
2

PAVONE & FONNER, LLP | AFFELD GRIVAKES ZUCKER LLP | BURNS & SCHALENDEBRAND

3

OFFICES OF

═════════
PAVONE & FONNER, LLP
═════════
A LAW PARTNERSHIP

4

7

BENJAMIN PAVONE, ESQ., SBN 181826
7676 HAZARD CENTER DRIVE, 5TH FLOOR
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: 619 224 8886
EMAIL: [e-mail]

8

FUTTERMAN DUPREE DODD
CROLEY MAIER LLP
MARTIN H. DODD (104363)
JAMIE L. DUPREE (158105)
JAIME G. TOUCHSTONE (233187)
180 Sansome Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant J. Clark Kelso

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

ALTAMIRANO, MARLON, et al.,

15

PLAINTIFFS,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,
et al.,
DEFENDANTS.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00607-LJO-SAB

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

1
2

PAVONE & FONNER, LLP | AFFELD GRIVAKES ZUCKER LLP | BURNS & SCHALENDEBRAND

3
4
5

Plaintiffs Marlon Altamirano, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant J. Clark Kelso
(“Defendant Kelso”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
1.

This case was filed on April 17, 2015. After being transferred to this Court,

the Court issued an order setting a scheduling conference on August 10, 2015.
2.

Because this case is related to Smith et al. v. Schwarzenegger et al., 1:14-cv-

6

00060-LJO-SAB (“Smith”), which is presently awaiting a potentially case-dispositive

7

ruling from the district court, this case, Altamirano, will likely track both the scheduling of

8

Smith and the outcome of its ruling. Accordingly, as discussions about a litigation

9

schedule should follow that ruling, the parties stipulate to continue this matter for

10
11

approximately (30) days, to a date convenient to the Court’s calendar.
So stipulated.

12
13

Dated: August 4, 2015

FUTTERMAN DUPREE DODD
CROLEY MAIER LLP

14

By: /s/Martin H. Dodd

15

Martin H. Dodd

16

Attorneys for Defendant J. Clark Kelso

17
18
19

Dated: August 4, 2015

PAVONE & FONNER, LLP

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

1

ORDER

2

Based on the Stipulation of the parties as set forth above, and good cause having

PAVONE & FONNER, LLP | AFFELD GRIVAKES ZUCKER LLP | BURNS & SCHALENDEBRAND

3

been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the scheduling conference set for August 10,

4

2015, and its related obligations (Dkt. No. 9), is continued to September 29, 2015 at 1:30

5

p.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated:

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

August 4, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE