Lobato v. Camacho et al

Filing 12

ORDER EXTENDING the Time for Defendant Eustolia Camacho to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant Eustolia Camacho shall have up to and including 8/7/2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The Case Management Conference shall re main on calendar for 7/2/2015, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/30/2015, is CONTINUED to 8/27/2015, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall file their joint scheduling report no later than 7 days prior to the scheduling conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/30/2015. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RACHEL LOBATO,
Plaintiff,

11
12

v.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00610-SKO
ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR
DEFENDANT EUSTOLIA CAMACHO TO
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

13
14
15
16

JOSE M. CAMACHO d/b/a EL MEXICANO
RESTAURANT & TAQUERIA; EUSTOLIA
CAMACHO individually and d/ba EL
MEXICANO RESTAURANT & TAQUERIA,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

17
18

The Complaint was filed on April 21, 2015, and served on Defendants Jose M. Camacho

19 d/b/a El Mexicano Restaurant and Eustolia Camacho, individually and d/b/a El Mexicano
20 Restaurant, on May 7, 2015, with an answer due on May 28, 2015. (See Docs. 1; 6; 7.) Plaintiff
21 Rachel Lobato (“Plaintiff”) filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant Jose M. Camacho
22 on May 22, 2015, and on May 27, 2015, the docket was updated to reflect that Defendant Jose M.
23 Camacho had been dismissed. (Docs. 8; 10.) On June 29, 2015, Plaintiff filed a stipulation and
24 proposed order for an extension of time for remaining Defendant Eustolia Camacho to respond to
25 the Complaint. (Doc. 11.)
26

The Parties stipulated to an extension of time to accommodate a Certified Access

27 Specialist report to be completed, which the Parties believe will lead to a conclusion of ongoing
28 settlement negotiations without further Court intervention. (Doc. 11.) The Parties request that

1 Defendant Eustolia Camacho’s response to the Complaint be filed by no later than August 7, 2015.
2 (Doc. 11.)
3

The Parties further request that the Case Management Conference currently set for July 2,

4 2015 (see Doc. 4) and the Scheduling Conference currently set for July 30, 2015 (see Doc. 3) be
5 rest until after Defendant Eustolia Camacho’s response to the Complaint is filed, in order to
6 “conserve the Court’s resources and time and not unnecessarily burden the Court with a matter
7 that will likely be informally resolved” (Doc. 11).
8

The Court agrees that judicial resources are best accommodated by continuing the

9 Scheduling Conference to date after Defendant Eustolia Camacho’s response to the Complaint has
10 been filed. However, as this case has been randomly selected for assignment to a United States
11 District Judge in the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District, the Case Management
12 Conference currently set for July 2, 2015, must go forward as calendared to appropriately assign
13 the case to a Sacramento District Judge if the Parties do not wish to consent to Magistrate Judge
14 jurisdiction.
15

ORDER

16

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation and, good cause appearing, the Court

17 ORDERS the following:
18

1) Defendant Eustolia Camacho shall have up to and including August 7, 2015, to answer

19 or otherwise respond to the Complaint;
20

2) The Case Management Conference shall remain on calendar for July 2, 2015, at 10:30

21 a.m. in Courtroom 7; and
22

3) The Scheduling Conference currently set for July 30, 2015, at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 7

23 will be continued to August 27, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. The Parties are directed to file their joint
24 scheduling report no later than 7 days prior to the scheduling conference.
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 30, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
2