Lobato v. Camacho et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/20/2015 DISMISSING CASE 20 with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Rachel Lobato
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RACHEL LOBATO,
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOSE M. CAMACHO dba EL MEXICANO
RESTAURANT & TAQUERIA, et al.,
Defendants.
) No. 1:15-cv-00610-MCE-SKO
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Rachel Lobato and Defendant
2
Eustolia Camacho, individually and dba El Mexicano Restaurant & Taqueria, the parties
3
remaining in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule
4
of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its
5
entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
6
7
Date: August 18, 2015
8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Rachel Lobato
9
10
11
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
Date: August 18, 2015
12
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
/s/ Keith M. White
Keith M. White
Attorneys for Defendant
Eustolia Camacho, individually and dba El
Mexicano Restaurant & Taqueria
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
18
19
20
21
22
The parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that this action is DISMISSED with
prejudice in its entirety, and each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk
of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 20, 2015
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?