Lobato v. Camacho et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/20/2015 DISMISSING CASE 20 with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Rachel Lobato 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RACHEL LOBATO, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. JOSE M. CAMACHO dba EL MEXICANO RESTAURANT & TAQUERIA, et al., Defendants. ) No. 1:15-cv-00610-MCE-SKO ) ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ) ACTION; ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Rachel Lobato and Defendant 2 Eustolia Camacho, individually and dba El Mexicano Restaurant & Taqueria, the parties 3 remaining in this action, by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule 4 of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its 5 entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 6 7 Date: August 18, 2015 8 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Rachel Lobato 9 10 11 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. Date: August 18, 2015 12 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP /s/ Keith M. White Keith M. White Attorneys for Defendant Eustolia Camacho, individually and dba El Mexicano Restaurant & Taqueria 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 20 21 22 The parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ordered that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety, and each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2015 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?