Mozingo v. Fisher et al

Filing 14

Stipulation to Strike Portions of First Amended Complaint; ORDER REQUIRING Filing of Second Amended Complaint Reflecting Stipulated Changes, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/10/2015. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
R. LAWRENCE BRAGG, State Bar No. 119194
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
Lowery and Ladd

8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FRESNO DIVISION
11
12
13

JAMES MOZINGO,

14
15

v.

16

1:15-cv-00633 LJO BAM
Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO STRIKE PORTIONS
OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
REFLECTING STIPULATED CHANGES

RAYTHEL FISHER, JR., et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23

After meeting and conferring, it is stipulated by and between Plaintiff Mozingo and
Defendants Lowery and Ladd that certain allegations are stricken from the First Amended
Complaint For Damages for Willful Violations of Civil Rights and for Pendent State Claims
(FAC) (ECF No. 12):

24
25
26

1.

The words “right to due process” at FAC 1:24-25; and

///
///

27
28
1
STIPULATION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (1:15-cv-00633 LJO BAM)

1

2.

The words “under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 and 42 U.S.C. § 1986 (conspiracy to deprive

2

civil rights)” at FAC 1:24-26. This language is stricken without prejudice to Mozingo re-alleging

3

a violation of 42 U.S.C. sections 1985 and 1986 after conducting discovery. Defendants Lowery

4

and Ladd agree that re-alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. sections 1985 and 1986 is not subject to

5

defenses based on the timeliness of the filing.

6

SO STIPULATED.

7

Dated: September 8, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

8

LAW OFFICE OF KEN I. KARAN

9

/S/ KEN I. KARAN
KEN I. KARAN
Attorney for Plaintiff Mozingo

10
11

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
MONICA N. ANDERSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

12
13
14

/s/ R. Lawrence Bragg

15
R. LAWRENCE BRAGG
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
Lowery and Ladd

16
17
18

ORDER

19
20

The above stipulation is granted, on the condition that Plaintiff file a Second Amended

21

Complaint that reflects the stipulated changes. This will help to ensure a clear record. This order

22

shall constitute leave to file a Second Amended Complaint for the above-mentioned purpose only.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 10, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (1:15-cv-00633 LJO BAM)