Ronald Young v. Sisodia et al
ORDER After Initial Scheduling Conference; ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Copy of Order Requiring Initial Disclosures and Setting an Initial Scheduling Conference re 36 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 9/20/17. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/13/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Gonzalez, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:15-cv-00640-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER AFTER INITIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND
PLAINTIFF A COPY OF ORDER
REQUIRING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
AND SETTING AN INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (ECF NO.
This Court conducted a scheduling conference on September 20, 2017. Plaintiff Ronald
Young telephonically appeared on his own behalf. Deputy Attorney General Brian Chan and
Supervising Deputy Attorney General Christopher Becker telephonically appeared on behalf of
At the conference, the Court confirmed that, despite being ordered to do so by the Court
(see ECF No. 36), Plaintiff did not provide Defendant with his initial disclosures or file a
scheduling conference statement. Plaintiff was served with the order and indeed attached the
order in his motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 46, p. 9-12).
The Court also asked Plaintiff if he was prepared to go forward with his case. Plaintiff
stated that he was not prepared to go forward.
After hearing from all parties, the Court continued the conference and gave Plaintiff
another chance to serve his initial disclosures and file a scheduling conference statement, and
generally prepare himself to go forward with his case. The Court reviewed the Court’s prior
order and described what was needed from him.
Accordingly, as stated on the record at the conference, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The Initial Scheduling Conference is continued to November 13, 2017, at 1:30
p.m. To join the conference, each party is directed to call the toll−free telephone
number (888) 251−2909 and use Access Code 1024453. Any party that is not
incarcerated is welcome to appear in person, but personal appearance is not
Plaintiff shall make arrangements with staff at his institution of confinement for
his attendance at the continued conference. Plaintiff’s institution of confinement
shall make Plaintiff available for the conference at the date and time indicated
above. Prior to the conference defense counsel shall confirm with Plaintiff’s
institution of confinement that arrangements have been made for Plaintiff’s
Plaintiff has until November 6, 2017, to file his scheduling conference statement
with the Court;
Plaintiff has until October 20, 2017, to serve his initial disclosures on
The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the order requiring
initial disclosures and setting an initial scheduling conference (ECF No. 36); and
Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case for failure
to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 20, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?