Ronald Young v. Sisodia et al
Filing
71
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 46 , 66 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/19/2017: 1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on November 17, 2017, are ADOPTED in full; and 2. The Motion is DENIED as moot. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RONALD YOUNG,
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00640-LJO-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
(ECF. NOS. 46 & 66)
C. SISODIA,
11
Defendant.
12
13
Ronald Young (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
14
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a
15
United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
16
17
On July 27, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction (“the Motion”).
(ECF No. 46).
18
On November 17, 2017, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and
19
recommendations, recommending that the Motion be denied as moot. (ECF No. 66). The
20
parties were provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations
21
within twenty-one days. No objections were filed.
22
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
23
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
24
the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
25
analysis.
26
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on November 17,
28
2017, are ADOPTED in full; and
1
1
2. The Motion is DENIED as moot.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
December 19, 2017
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?