Ronald Young v. Sisodia et al
Filing
73
ORDER Following Discovery and Status Conference; ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff Copy of Scheduling Order 67 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/10/2018. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY AND
STATUS CONFERENCE
v.
12
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-00640-LJO-EPG (PC)
RONALD YOUNG,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND
PLAINTIFF COPY OF SCHEDULING
ORDER (ECF NO. 67)
C. SISODIA,
Defendant.
14
15
Ronald Young (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
16
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 9, 2018, the Court held a
17
Discovery and Status Conference (“Conference”). Plaintiff telephonically appeared on his own
18
behalf.
19
Defendant.
Counsel Brian Chan and Lawrence Bragg telephonically appeared on behalf of
20
As stated on the record at the Conference, IT IS ORDERED that:
21
1. Defendant has until April 10, 2018, to re-serve their discovery requests on Plaintiff;
22
2. If Plaintiff does not receive the discovery requests by April 20, 2018, Plaintiff shall
23
notify the Court by filing a notice that he did not receive the discovery requests;
24
3. If Plaintiff fails to respond to the discovery requests, Plaintiff’s case may be
25
dismissed for failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute;
26
4. The non-expert discovery cutoff is extended to June 22, 2018;
27
///
28
///
1
1
5. The parties have until June 15, 2018,1 to file motions to compel and for sanctions
2
3
regarding the discovery discussed in this order; and
6. The Clerk of Court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the Scheduling Order (ECF
4
No. 67).
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 10, 2018
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
This deadline was not stated on the record.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?