Moore v. Omninet Properties Manchester Center, LLC, et al.

Filing 41

STIPULATION to Extend Defendant Armen Poghosyan dba Manchester Steakhouse's Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; ORDER - response to Complaint by 7/15/2015. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/23/2015. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

KEITH M. WHITE #188536
COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP
Attorneys at Law
499 West Shaw, Suite 116
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant, ARMEN POGHOSYAN dba
MANCHESTER STEAKHOUSE
TANYA E. MOORE #206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, RONALD MOORE

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

RONALD MOORE,

v.

17

19

1:15-cv-00644---BAM

Plaintiff(s),

16

18

NO.

OMNINET PROPERTIES
MANCHESTER CENTER, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company; et al.,

20

Defendant(s).

21

STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT ARMEN POGHOSYAN
DBA MANCHESTER STEAKHOUSE’S
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER
Complaint Served: April 29, 2015
Response Date: June 17, 2015
New Response Date: July 15, 2015

22
23
24
WHEREAS, the responsive pleading of Defendant, Armen Poghosyan dba Manchester

25
26
27
28

Steakhouse (hereinafter “Defendant”), was due on June 17, 2015, as the result of being served on
April 29, 2015;
///
WHEREAS, the scheduling conference in this matter is currently set for August 4, 2015;

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant wish additional time to attempt resolution of the
matter without incurring fees and costs associated with filing responsive pleadings;
WHEREAS, the parties wish to conserve the Court’s resources and time and not
unnecessarily burden the Court with a matter that will likely be informally resolved;

5

WHEREAS, a brief extension of time is necessary in order to complete the terms of the

6

settlement between the parties and it is likely that the case will settle without further use of the

7

Court’s resources and time;

8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, the extension granted in this Stipulation will not affect or change any of the
currently scheduled Court dates in this case.
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff, through his attorney of record, and Defendant, through
their attorney of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.

That Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint be extended to July 15, 2015.

13
14

Dated: June 16, 2015

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP

15
By:____/s/ Keith M. White______________
KEITH M. WHITE
Attorneys for Defendant,
ARMEN POGHOSYAN dba MANCHESTER
STEAKHOUSE

16
17
18
19

Dated: June 16, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By:___/s/ Tanya E. Moore_____________
TANYA E. MOORE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RONALD MOORE

ORDER

1
2
3

The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Armen Poghosyan dba Manchester

5

Steakhouse’s response to the Complaint be filed no later than July 15, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

June 23, 2015

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE