Singh et al v. Bunch et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/13/15 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 15 is CONTINUED to 9/14/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180
John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT, BIRGIT FLADAGER, ADAM CHRISTIANSON, DAVID HARRIS AND
KIRK BUNCH
[Public Entity exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code § 6103]

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

PRAVEEN SINGH, an individual, and
JOYTESHNA KARAN, an individual,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16

vs.

22

KIRK BUNCH, an individual, FRANK
NAVARRO, an individual, JOHN EVERS,
an individual, DAVID HARRIS, BIRGIT
FLADAGER,
THE
COUNTY
OF
STANISLAUS, a government entity, ADAM
CHRISTIANSON,
STANISLAUS
COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, a
government entity, and DOES 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.

23

CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00646-GEB-BAM
STIPULATION
TO
CONTINUE
DEFENDANTS
COUNTY
OF
STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY
SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT,
BIRGIT
FLADAGER, ADAM CHRISTIANSON,
DAVID HARRIS AND KIRK BUNCH’S
MOTION TO DIMISS; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

___________________________________/

17
18
19
20
21

Complaint Filed: April 27, 2015

24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

{01445083.DOCX}

1

Plaintiffs PRAVEEN SINGH and JOYTESHNA KARAN and Defendants COUNTY OF

2

STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BIRGIT FLADAGER,

3

ADAM CHRISTIANSON, DAVID HARRIS and KIRK BUNCH, by and through their respective

4

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to continue Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss currently

5

scheduled for August 24, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. to September 14, 2015, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. The parties

6

submit good cause exists to continue the motion to dismiss as an amended complaint is being

7

contemplated to address issues raised in the motion.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9
10

Dated: August 13, 2015

11

By: /s/ Alejandro H. Herrera (authorized on 8/12/15)
Alejandro H. Herrera
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13
14

HESS, HESS & HERRERA, P.C.

Dated: August 13, 2015

PORTER SCOTT

15

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

16

By

17
18
19

/s/ John R. Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS COUNTY
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BIRGIT FLADAGER, ADAM
CHRISTIANSON, DAVID HARRIS AND KIRK BUNCH

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

{01445083.DOCX}

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is continued to September

3

14, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

4

Dated: August 13, 2015

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

{01445083.DOCX}