Williford v. Scrivner
Filing
31
ORDER DENYING 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/6/2015. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
RICHARD WILLIFORD,
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
PHILLIP HALL,
14
Defendant.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00653- KJM - JLT
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
STRIKE THE MOTION TO DISMISS
(Doc. 28)
16
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint on July 24, 2015. (Doc.
17
27) Plaintiff contends the motion should be stricken for failure to comply with Local Rule 131, which
18
requires that all electronic filings be signed. (Doc. 28) According to Plaintiff, Defendant violated the
19
Local Rules because there is “the Motion to Dismiss has no original signature,” and no proof of service
20
was filed. (Id. at 2)
21
Significantly, however, Defendant filed a proof of service indicating the motion to dismiss was
22
served on Plaintiff by mail on July 23, 2015. (Doc. 27-1 at 1) Both the proof of service and the motion
23
to dismiss bear electronic signatures. (See id; Doc. 27 at 5) Pursuant to Local Rule 131, electronic
24
signatures are permitted when filing documents with the Court:
25
26
Anything filed using an attorney’s name, login, and password will be deemed to have
been signed by that attorney for all purposes, including Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. For example,
for the attorney whose login and password is being used, it is sufficient to indicate a
signature as in the following example: “/s/ John M. Barrister, Esquire.”
27
28
Local Rule 131(c).
1
1
Because the motion to dismiss and the proof of service were electronically signed, Defendant
2
complied with the requirements of Local Rule 131. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to strike (Doc. 28)
3
is DENIED.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 6, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?