Solorio v. Johnson, et al.

Filing 22

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/30/16. Show Cause Response due by 4/29/2016. (Verduzco, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

ANSELMO SOLORIO,

13
14

15-cv-657 DAD-EPG

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

15
16
17
18

JUDGE JOHNSON et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff, Anselmo Solorio (“Plaintiff”) appearing pro se and informa pauperis, filed two

19

complaints in this action. (Docs. 1 and 17). On January 15, 2016, the Court screened Plaintiff’s

20

complaints and the complaints were dismissed with leave to amend. (Doc. 20). Plaintiff was

21

instructed to file any amended complaint no later than February 26, 2016.

22

To date, no amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, no later than April 29, 2016,

23

Plaintiff shall file a written response to this Order to Show Cause indicating whether he will

24

pursue this action, or in the alternative, he shall file an amended complaint consistent with the

25

instructions outlined in this Court’s screening order. (Doc. 20).

26

Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause as outlined

27

above will result in dismissal of this action without further notice for failure to prosecute

28

and for failure to follow a court order. If Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this action, he
1

1

shall file a notice of voluntary dismissal in lieu of responding to this Order to Show Cause.

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 30, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2