Hackett v. Fisher et al

Filing 53

ORDER Regarding 52 Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, with Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/10/18. Case Closed(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHEN HACKETT, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. TOOR, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00670-DAD-BAM (PC) ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 52) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Stephen Hackett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending are the Court’s 19 findings and recommendations to grant Defendant Toor’s motion for summary judgment for 20 failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 49.) 21 On August 29, 2018, Plaintiff filed a “Motion to Abandon All Claims for Relief.” (ECF 22 No. 50.) Pursuant to that notice, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer to clarify their 23 intent with respect to dismissal of this action, whether such dismissal would be with or without 24 prejudice, and to file a response or stipulation accordingly. (ECF No. 145.) 25 Currently before the Court is a stipulation for voluntary dismissal of this action with 26 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), filed by defense counsel. 27 (ECF No. 52.) The stipulation is signed and dated by Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant Toor, 28 and indicates that each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 1 1 Accordingly, this action is terminated by operation of law without further order from the 2 Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate all pending 3 motions and deadlines and close this case. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara September 10, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?