Mission Linen Supply v. City of Visalia
Filing
113
ORDER re: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL REGARDG CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION ONLY, FROM MISSION LINEN'S COMPLAINT, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/4/2017. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LORI J. GUALCO (Bar No. 95232)
GUALCO LAW
400 Capitol Mall, Eleventh Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel: (916) 930-0700
Fax: (916) 930-0705
Email: ljgualco@gualcolaw.com
JAN A. GREBEN (Bar No. 103464)
CHRISTINE M. MONROE (Bar No. 304573)
GREBEN & ASSOCIATES
125 E. De La Guerra Street, Suite 203
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Tel: (805) 963-9090
Fax: (805) 963-9098
Email: jan@grebenlaw.com
Email: christine@grebenlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO DIVISION
13
14
15
MISSION LINEN SUPPLY, a California
Corporation,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
v.
CITY OF VISALIA, and Does 1-20, inclusive,
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL REGARDG
CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION, ONLY,
FROM MISSION LINEN’S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Defendant.
19
Honorable Judge Anthony W. Ishii
20
21
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
-1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION, ONLY; ORDER
1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG
1
It is hereby stipulated by and between plaintiff Mission Linen Supply (“Mission Linen”) and
2
defendant City of Visalia (“City”) that pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), the
3
following causes of action, only, are voluntarily dismissed without prejudice from Mission Linen’s
4
Complaint (Document 2):
5
1. Third Cause of Action for Continuing Private Nuisance;
6
2. Fourth Cause of Action for Nuisance Per Se;
7
3. Fifth Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief;
8
4. Sixth Cause of Action for Dangerous Condition of Public Property;
9
5. Seventh Cause of Action for Continuing Public Nuisance; and
10
6. Eighth Cause of Action for Equitable Indemnity.
11
It is further stipulated that each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.
12
13
Dated: October 3, 2017
GUALCO LAW
14
/s/ Lori J. Gualco
Lori J. Gualco
Attorney for Plaintiff MISSION LINEN
SUPPLY
15
16
17
18
Dated: October 3, 2017
GREBEN & ASSOCIATES
19
/s/ Jan A. Greben as authorized on 10/03/17
Jan A. Greben
Christine M. Monroe
Attorneys for Plaintiff MISSION LINEN
SUPPLY
20
21
22
23
Date: October 3, 2017
HERR, PEDERSEN & BERGLUND LLP
24
25
26
/s/ Leonard C. Herr as authorized on 10/03/17
Leonard C. Herr
Attorney for Defendant CITY OF VISALIA
27
28
-2STIPULATED REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION, ONLY; ORDER
1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG
1
2
3
4
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based on the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing thereon, it is HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1. The following causes of action, only, are dismissed without prejudice from Mission
Linen’s Complaint (Document 2):
6
a. Third Cause of Action for Continuing Private Nuisance;
7
b. Fourth Cause of Action for Nuisance Per Se;
8
c. Fifth Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief;
9
d. Sixth Cause of Action for Dangerous Condition of Public Property;
10
e. Seventh Cause of Action for Continuing Public Nuisance; and
11
f. Eighth Cause of Action for Equitable Indemnity.
12
2. Each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs; and
13
3. The operative Pre-Trial Order shall be considered amended to exclude references related
14
to Mission Linen’s Third Cause of Action for Continuing Private Nuisance, Fourth Cause
15
of Action for Nuisance Per Se, Fifth Cause of Action for Declaratory Relief, Sixth Cause
16
of Action for Dangerous Condition of Public Property, Seventh Cause of Action for
17
Continuing Public Nuisance, and Eighth Cause of Action for Equitable Indemnity.
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 4, 2017
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATED REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CAUSES OF ACTION, ONLY; ORDER
1:15-cv-00672-AWI-EPG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?