Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al.
Filing
249
AMENDED ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE and ORDER FOLLOWING PRE-SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/22/2024. Telephonic Pre-Settlement Conference set for 10/23/2024 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Settlement Conference set for 10/30/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
DESIREE MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00683 DAD SKO
AMENDED ORDER re SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
9
v.
10
11
KYLE PENNINGTON, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER FOLLOWING PRESETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
12
_____________________________________/
13
14
On August 22, 2024, the Court held a telephonic pre-settlement conference. Kevin Little,
15
Esq., appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Defendant Kyle Pennington appeared pro se. John Phillips,
16
Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendants Kim Pennington and the Estate of Connie Pennington.
17
The Court discussed with the parties the status of settlement negotiations and whether a
18
settlement conference on August 27, 2024, would be productive. Based on its discussion with the
19
parties, the Court determines that a settlement conference on that date would not be productive, in
20
view of the Petition for Writ of Certiorari currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the settlement conference to October 30,
2024, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.
Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to
the settlement conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer
A settlement conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the parties
exchange written settlement proposals. Accordingly, by no later than October 2, 2024, Plaintiff
1
shall submit a written itemization of damages and settlement demand to each defendant with a brief
2
summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the demand. By no later than October 9, 2024,
3
each defendant shall submit a written offer to Plaintiff with a brief summary of the legal and factual
4
basis supporting the offer.
5
The parties shall continue to meet and confer thereafter to attempt to compromise regarding
6
their respective positions, so as to assist with ensuring that the settlement conference will be
7
productive.
8
9
2.
Submission and Content of Updated Confidential Settlement Conference
Statements
10
The parties are to send updated Confidential Settlement Conference Statements (Settlement
11
Statement) to the following email address: SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov, to arrive no later than
12
October 16, 2024. Each statement shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL” with the date and
13
time of the mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently. Each party shall also file a
14
Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement (See L.R. 270 (d)).
15
16
17
18
The updated Settlement Statements shall be complete in themselves, without reference to
any prior Settlement Statements.
Each Settlement Statement shall include the following:
a.
A brief summary of the core facts, allegations, and defenses, a forthright
19
evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and
20
defenses, and a description of the major issues in dispute.
21
b.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
22
c.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,
23
pretrial, and trial.
24
d.
The nature of the relief sought.
25
e.
An outline of past settlement efforts including information regarding the
26
"Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer" required
27
above—including the itemization of damages—and a history of past
28
settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
2
1
f.
2
A statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the Settlement
Conference.
3
3.
4
Although the parties shall be prepared to attend the settlement conference in person, they
5
may jointly request that the settlement conference be conducted by Zoom videoconference. If the
6
Court determines that a Zoom videoconference would be productive and the request for a Zoom
7
videoconference is granted, the Court will provide call in information before the settlement
8
conference date.
9
4.
Zoom Videoconferences
Attendance of Trial Counsel and Parties Required
10
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case and
11
parties with full and complete settlement authority shall personally attend the conference.1 An
12
insured party shall appear by a representative of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who
13
has full authority to negotiate and settle the case. An uninsured corporate party shall appear by a
14
representative authorized to negotiate, and who has full authority to negotiate and settle the case. It
15
is difficult for a party who is not present to appreciate the process and the reasons that may justify
16
a change in one’s perspective toward settlement. Accordingly, having a client with authority
17
available by telephone is not an acceptable alternative, except under the most extenuating
18
circumstances.2
19
20
21
The Court expects both the lawyers and the party representatives to be fully prepared to
participate. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess their previous
positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.
22
5.
23
The parties shall be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:
24
a.
25
26
27
28
Issues to Be Discussed
Goals in the litigation and problems they would like to address in the
settlement conference and understanding of the opposing side’s goals.
1
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by
a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved
in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements.
2
Out of town or out of state travel and the purchase of an airplane ticket are not extenuating circumstances.
3
1
b.
The issues (in and outside the lawsuit) that need to be resolved.
2
c.
The strengths and weaknesses of their case.
3
d.
Their understanding of the opposing side’s view of the case.
4
e.
Their points of agreement and disagreement (factual and legal).
5
f.
Any financial, emotional, and/or legal impediments to settlement.
6
g.
Whether settlement or further litigation better enables the accomplishment
7
of their respective goals.
8
h.
9
6.
Any possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute.
Statements Inadmissible
10
The parties are expected to address each other with courtesy and respect and are encouraged
11
to be frank and open in their discussions. Statements made by any party during the settlement
12
conference are not to be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial.
13
7.
14
Prior to the Settlement Conference, Magistrate Judge Oberto will hold a brief, telephonic
15
discussion on October 23, 2024, at 4:00 PM (dial-in number: 1-888-557-8511; passcode:
16
6208204#). Only attorneys and unrepresented parties are required to participate in the conference.
Pre-Settlement Telephonic Conference
17
8.
18
The deadlines and directives in this order supersede the deadlines and directives set forth
19
in the “Order re Settlement Conference” (Doc. 242). The Court may impose sanctions on any
20
party or any party’s counsel that fails to comply with this order.
Superseding of Order re Settlement Conference; Sanctions
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
Dated:
24
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
August 22, 2024
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?