Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al.
Filing
259
SECOND AMENDED ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/24/2024. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
DESIREE MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00683 DAD SKO
SECOND AMENDED ORDER re
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
9
v.
10
11
KYLE PENNINGTON, et al.,
Defendants.
12
_____________________________________/
13
14
This case is now set for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto
15
on November 21, 2024, at 2:00 PM at the U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California,
16
93721.
17
18
Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to
the settlement conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
1.
20
A settlement conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the parties
21
exchange written settlement proposals. Accordingly, by no later than November 12, 2024, Plaintiff
22
shall submit a written itemization of damages and settlement demand to each defendant with a brief
23
summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the demand. By no later than November 15,
24
25
26
27
28
Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer
2024, each defendant shall submit a written offer to Plaintiff with a brief summary of the legal and
factual basis supporting the offer.
1
The parties shall continue to meet and confer thereafter to attempt to compromise regarding
2
their respective positions, so as to assist with ensuring that the settlement conference will be
3
productive.
4
5
2.
Submission and Content of Updated Confidential Settlement Conference
Statements
6
The parties are to send updated Confidential Settlement Conference Statements (Settlement
7
Statement) to the following email address: SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov, to arrive no later than
8
November 19, 2024. Each statement shall be clearly marked “CONFIDENTIAL” with the date and
9
time of the mandatory settlement conference indicated prominently. Each party shall also file a
10
11
12
13
14
Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement (See L.R. 270 (d)).
The updated Settlement Statements shall be complete in themselves, without reference to
any prior Settlement Statements.
Each Settlement Statement shall include the following:
a.
A brief summary of the core facts, allegations, and defenses, a forthright
15
evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and
16
defenses, and a description of the major issues in dispute.
17
b.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
18
c.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,
19
pretrial, and trial.
20
d.
The nature of the relief sought.
21
e.
An outline of past settlement efforts including information regarding the
22
"Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer" required
23
above—including the itemization of damages—and a history of past
24
settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
25
26
f.
A statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the Settlement
Conference.
27
28
2
1
3.
2
The parties shall be prepared to attend the settlement conference in person. They may jointly
3
request that the settlement conference be conducted by Zoom videoconference if they can set forth
4
specific reasons why a Zoom videoconference would be more productive than personal appearance
5
at the settlement conference. If the request for a Zoom videoconference is granted, the Court will
6
provide call in information before the settlement conference date.
Zoom Videoconferences
7
4.
8
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case and
9
parties with full and complete settlement authority shall personally attend the conference.1 An
10
insured party shall appear by a representative of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who
11
has full authority to negotiate and settle the case. An uninsured corporate party shall appear by a
12
representative authorized to negotiate, and who has full authority to negotiate and settle the case. It
13
is difficult for a party who is not present to appreciate the process and the reasons that may justify
14
a change in one’s perspective toward settlement. Accordingly, having a client with authority
15
available by telephone is not an acceptable alternative, except under the most extenuating
16
circumstances.2
Attendance of Trial Counsel and Parties Required
17
The Court expects both the lawyers and the party representatives to be fully prepared to
18
participate. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess their previous
19
positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.
20
5.
21
Issues to Be Discussed
The parties shall be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:
22
a.
23
settlement conference and understanding of the opposing side’s goals.
24
25
26
27
28
Goals in the litigation and problems they would like to address in the
b.
The issues (in and outside the lawsuit) that need to be resolved.
c.
The strengths and weaknesses of their case.
1
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by
a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved
in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements.
2
Out of town or out of state travel and the purchase of an airplane ticket are not extenuating circumstances.
3
1
d.
Their understanding of the opposing side’s view of the case.
2
e.
Their points of agreement and disagreement (factual and legal).
3
f.
Any financial, emotional, and/or legal impediments to settlement.
4
g.
Whether settlement or further litigation better enables the accomplishment
5
of their respective goals.
6
h.
Any possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute.
7
6.
8
The parties are expected to address each other with courtesy and respect and are encouraged
9
to be frank and open in their discussions. Statements made by any party during the settlement
10
Statements Inadmissible
conference are not to be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial.
11
7.
12
The deadlines and directives in this order supersede the deadlines and directives set forth
13
in the “Amended Order re Settlement Conference” (Doc. 249). The Court may impose
14
sanctions on any party or any party’s counsel that fails to comply with this order.
Superseding of Order re Settlement Conference; Sanctions
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated:
18
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
October 24, 2024
.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?