Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al.

Filing 57

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/12/16 ORDERING that the current discovery deadlines should be EXTENDED as follows: (a) Non-expert Discovery shall be completed by 3/15/17; (b) Expert witness shall be disclosed by 3 /15/17; (c) Supplemental expert witnesses shall be disclosed by 3/29/17; and (d) Expert Discovery shall be completed by 5/26/17. The current trial and pretrial deadlines should be EXENDED as follows: (a) Non-dispositive Motions shall be filed no la ter than 6/4/17; (b) Dispositive Motions shall be filed no later than 6/27/17 and noticed for hearing on 7/25/17 at 1:30 p.m.; (c) A joint pretrial statement shall be filed on or before 9/29/17; (d) a Pretrial Conference shall be held on 10/6/17 at 10:00 a.m.; and (e) Jury trial shall be set for 12/4/17 at 9:00 a.m.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
Kevin G. Little, SBN 149818 1 Michelle L. Tostenrude, SBN 290141 LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN G. LITTLE 2 Post Office Box 8656 Fresno, CA 93747 3 Phone Number: (559) 342-5800 Fax Number: (559) 420-0839 4 Email: kevin@kevinglittle.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff DESIREE MARTINEZ 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 Case No.: 1:15-cv-0683 JAM MJS DESIREE MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: MODIFICATION OF DISCOVERY AND CASE SCHEDULE vs. 13 KYLE PENNINGTON; KIM PENNINGTON; 14 CONNIE PENNINGTON; KRISTINA HERSHBERGER; JESUS SANTILLAN; 15 CHANNON HIGH; THE CITY OF CLOVIS; ANGELA YAMBUPAH; RALPH SALAZAR; 16 FRED SANDERS; THE CITY OF SANGER; AND DOES 1 through 20, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: WHEREAS the pleadings remain unsettled, due to the pendency of a motion challenging the 22 plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint until the Court's ruling on August 9, 2016 (Dkt. No. 55), and 23 the current pending status of the moving defendants' responsive pleadings; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the parties agree that the operative pleadings will define the scope of discovery; and 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that the pleadings will be settled within the next 20 days, in compliance with the Court's August 9, 2016 Order; and -1Stipulation and Proposed Order WHEREAS, all parties are in agreement that good cause exists for modification of the case schedule based upon these factors, 1 2 3 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: The current discovery deadlines should be extended as follows: (a) Non-expert discovery 4 shall be completed by March 15, 2017; (b) Expert witness shall be disclosed by March 15, 2017; (c) 5 Supplemental expert witnesses shall be disclosed by March 29, 2017; and (d) Expert discovery shall 6 7 be completed by May 26, 2017. The current trial and pretrial deadlines should be extended as follows: (a) Non-dispositive 8 9 motions shall be filed no later than June 4, 2017; (b) Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 10 June 27, 2017 and noticed for hearing on July 25, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.; (c) A joint pretrial statement 11 shall be filed on or before September 29, 2017; (d) a pretrial conference shall be held on October 6, 12 2017 at 10:00 a.m.; and (e) Jury trial shall be set for December 4, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 14 15 Date: August 10, 2016 Kevin G. Little Law Office of Kevin G. Little Attorneys for Plaintiff Desiree Martinez 16 17 18 19 Date: August 10, 2016 /s/ Yan Shrayberman Yan Shrayberman Attorney for Defendant Kyle Pennington 20 21 Date: August 10, 2016 /s/ John Phillips John W. Phillips Wild, Carter & Tipton Attorneys for Defendants Kim and Connie Pennington 22 23 24 25 26 -2– 27 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order 1 Date: August 10, 2016 2 3 4 5 6 /s/ Craig Smith G. Craig Smith Ferguson, Praet & Sherman Attorneys for Defendants City of Clovis, City of Sanger and Kristina Hershberger, Jesus Santillan, Channon High, Angela Yambupah, Ralph Salazar and Fred Sanders IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED ABOVE BY THE COURT: 7 8 9 10 Dated: August 12, 2016 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ U. S. District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3Stipulation and Proposed Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?