Martinez v. City of Clovis, et al.
Filing
57
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/12/16 ORDERING that the current discovery deadlines should be EXTENDED as follows: (a) Non-expert Discovery shall be completed by 3/15/17; (b) Expert witness shall be disclosed by 3 /15/17; (c) Supplemental expert witnesses shall be disclosed by 3/29/17; and (d) Expert Discovery shall be completed by 5/26/17. The current trial and pretrial deadlines should be EXENDED as follows: (a) Non-dispositive Motions shall be filed no la ter than 6/4/17; (b) Dispositive Motions shall be filed no later than 6/27/17 and noticed for hearing on 7/25/17 at 1:30 p.m.; (c) A joint pretrial statement shall be filed on or before 9/29/17; (d) a Pretrial Conference shall be held on 10/6/17 at 10:00 a.m.; and (e) Jury trial shall be set for 12/4/17 at 9:00 a.m.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Kevin G. Little, SBN 149818
1 Michelle L. Tostenrude, SBN 290141
LAW OFFICE OF KEVIN G. LITTLE
2 Post Office Box 8656
Fresno, CA 93747
3 Phone Number: (559) 342-5800
Fax Number: (559) 420-0839
4 Email: kevin@kevinglittle.com
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
DESIREE MARTINEZ
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Case No.: 1:15-cv-0683 JAM MJS
DESIREE MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
MODIFICATION OF DISCOVERY AND
CASE SCHEDULE
vs.
13
KYLE PENNINGTON; KIM PENNINGTON;
14 CONNIE PENNINGTON; KRISTINA
HERSHBERGER; JESUS SANTILLAN;
15 CHANNON HIGH; THE CITY OF CLOVIS;
ANGELA YAMBUPAH; RALPH SALAZAR;
16 FRED SANDERS; THE CITY OF SANGER;
AND DOES 1 through 20,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
WHEREAS the pleadings remain unsettled, due to the pendency of a motion challenging the
22 plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint until the Court's ruling on August 9, 2016 (Dkt. No. 55), and
23 the current pending status of the moving defendants' responsive pleadings; and
24
25
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the operative pleadings will define the scope of
discovery; and
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that the pleadings will be settled within the next 20 days,
in compliance with the Court's August 9, 2016 Order; and
-1Stipulation and Proposed Order
WHEREAS, all parties are in agreement that good cause exists for modification of the case
schedule based upon these factors,
1
2
3
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
The current discovery deadlines should be extended as follows: (a) Non-expert discovery
4 shall be completed by March 15, 2017; (b) Expert witness shall be disclosed by March 15, 2017; (c)
5 Supplemental expert witnesses shall be disclosed by March 29, 2017; and (d) Expert discovery shall
6
7
be completed by May 26, 2017.
The current trial and pretrial deadlines should be extended as follows: (a) Non-dispositive
8
9
motions shall be filed no later than June 4, 2017; (b) Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than
10 June 27, 2017 and noticed for hearing on July 25, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.; (c) A joint pretrial statement
11 shall be filed on or before September 29, 2017; (d) a pretrial conference shall be held on October 6,
12 2017 at 10:00 a.m.; and (e) Jury trial shall be set for December 4, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14
15
Date: August 10, 2016
Kevin G. Little
Law Office of Kevin G. Little
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Desiree Martinez
16
17
18
19
Date: August 10, 2016
/s/ Yan Shrayberman
Yan Shrayberman
Attorney for Defendant
Kyle Pennington
20
21
Date: August 10, 2016
/s/ John Phillips
John W. Phillips
Wild, Carter & Tipton
Attorneys for
Defendants Kim and
Connie Pennington
22
23
24
25
26
-2–
27
28
Stipulation and Proposed Order
1
Date: August 10, 2016
2
3
4
5
6
/s/ Craig Smith
G. Craig Smith
Ferguson, Praet & Sherman
Attorneys for Defendants
City of Clovis, City of Sanger and
Kristina Hershberger, Jesus Santillan, Channon
High, Angela Yambupah, Ralph Salazar and
Fred Sanders
IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED ABOVE BY THE COURT:
7
8
9
10
Dated: August 12, 2016
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
U. S. District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3Stipulation and Proposed Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?