Willis v. Enterprise Drilling Fluids, Inc. et al

Filing 76

ORDER GRANTING 75 Defendant DrilTek's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/28/2016. Filing deadline 11/10/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15

KENNETH WILLIS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ENTERPRISE DRILLING FLUIDS, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-000688 - JLT
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
DRILTEK’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION OR
STATEMENT OF NONOPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF
JUDGMENT
(Doc. 75)

16
17

On August 26, 2016, the Court granted Driltek’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 65)

18

Given there were other parties involved in the case, the Court did not enter judgment. After filing his

19

notice of appeal and being confronted, apparently, with the fact that no judgment had entered, the

20

plaintiff filed an application for entry of judgment. (Doc. 72) The Court ordered the other parties to

21

file opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the request. (Doc. 74) Due to inadvertence, counsel

22

for Driltek was deleted from the service list and did not receive the Court’s order. (Doc. 75 at 2) Thus,

23

Driltek requests an extension of time to respond until November 10, 2016. Id.

24

Good cause appearing, Driltek’s request for an extension of time to November 10, 2016 to file

25

an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the plaintiff’s request for entry of judgment is

26

GRANTED.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 28, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28