Patino v. KVS Transportation, Inc. et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/1/16 ORDERING that the deadline to complete Phase I discovery is CONTINUED to 3/29/16 for purposes of (i) completing the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS' Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and (ii) disclosing expert witnesses. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com Thomas Segal (SBN 222791) thomas@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 907 Beverly Hills, California 90212 T: (310) 888-7771 | F: (310) 888-0109 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN PATINO HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP Tamara I. Devitt/Bar No. 209683 tamara.devitt@haynesboone.com Kimberly A. Chase/Bar No. 253311 kimberly.chase@haynesboone.com Matthew E. Costello/Bar No. 295062 matthew.costello@haynesboone.com 600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 700 Costa Mesa, California 92626 T: (949) 202-3000 | F: (949) 202-3001 Attorneys for Defendants KVS TRANSPORTATION, INC. and NABORS DRILLING USA, LP 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUAN PATINO, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, Case No. 1:15-CV-00713-TLN-SMS ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) ) KVS TRANSPORTATION, INC., a ) California corporation; NABORS DRILLING ) USA, L.P., a Delaware corporation; and ) ) DOES 1-50, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Assigned to U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE TO COMPLETE CURRENTLY NOTICED DEPOSITIONS AND FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES Complaint filed: May 8, 2015 1 Joint Stipulation and Order to Continue Discovery Cut-off Date to Complete Currently Noticed Depositions and for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses 1 Plaintiff Juan Patino (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants KVS Transportation, Inc. (“KVS”) 2 and Nabors Drilling USA, LP (collectively, the “Parties”), through their respective counsel, 3 hereby stipulate as follows: 4 5 WHEREAS, on July 28, 2015, the Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order governing discovery and other pretrial proceedings (Dkt. No. 14) (“Order”) for this case; 6 7 WHEREAS, the Order bifurcates discovery into two phases, with Phase I discovery limited to facts that are relevant to whether this action should be certified as a class action; 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order, all Phase I discovery must be completed by the 9 Parties on or before January 29, 2016 and the Parties must disclose their respective expert 10 witnesses on or before February 29, 2016; WHEREAS, on December 31, 2015, KVS noticed Plaintiff’s deposition for January 20, 11 12 13 14 15 16 2016; WHEREAS, on January 8, 2016, Plaintiff served a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice on KVS, with such deposition to be held on January 22, 2016; WHEREAS, on January 12, 2016, Plaintiff’s counsel informed counsel for KVS that Plaintiff was not available on the noticed date of January 20, 2016; 17 WHEREAS, on January 13, 2016, counsel for KVS informed Plaintiff’s counsel that 18 KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent and counsel for KVS were not available on the noticed date of 19 January 22, 2016, provided alternative dates for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition and asked for 20 alternative dates for Plaintiff’s deposition, and suggested to Plaintiff’s counsel that Plaintiff’s 21 deposition and the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition be scheduled for the same day; 22 WHEREAS, the Parties are in the process of meeting and conferring in good faith to 23 schedule the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, with 24 the aim of completing these depositions by the end of February 2016, subject to witness and 25 counsel availability; 26 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that good cause exists to continue the Phase I discovery 27 cut-off date (i) to complete the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 28 2 Joint Stipulation and Order to Continue Discovery Cut-off Date to Complete Currently Noticed Depositions and for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses 1 30(b)(6) deponent only, and (ii) to disclose expert witnesses, if any, which may be necessary 2 following the depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent; 3 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that continuing the Phase I discovery cut-off by 60 days to 4 complete the currently outstanding depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent 5 and to disclose expert witnesses would promote efficiency and judicial economy, as it will allow 6 the Parties to engage in necessary pre-certification discovery; and 7 8 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that neither party will be prejudiced by the requested continuance. 9 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby 10 stipulate, subject to this Court’s approval, that the deadline to complete Phase I discovery, 11 currently set for January 29, 2016, shall be continued to March 29, 2016 for purposes of (i) 12 completing the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and 13 (ii) disclosing expert witnesses. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Date: February 1, 2016 SETARAH LAW GROUP By: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Date: February 1, 2016 /s/ Shaun Setarah Shaun Setarah Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN PATINO HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP By: /s/ Matthew E. Costello Matthew E. Costello Attorneys for Defendants KVS TRANSPORTATION, INC. and NABORS DRILLING USA, LP (as authorized on January 27, 2016 per L.R. 131(e)) 26 27 28 3 Joint Stipulation and Order to Continue Discovery Cut-off Date to Complete Currently Noticed Depositions and for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the deadline to complete Phase I discovery, currently 3 set for January 29, 2016, shall be continued to March 29, 2016 for purposes of (i) completing 4 the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and (ii) 5 disclosing expert witnesses. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: February 1, 2016 9 10 11 12 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?