Patino v. KVS Transportation, Inc. et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/1/16 ORDERING that the deadline to complete Phase I discovery is CONTINUED to 3/29/16 for purposes of (i) completing the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS' Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and (ii) disclosing expert witnesses. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514)
shaun@setarehlaw.com
Thomas Segal (SBN 222791)
thomas@setarehlaw.com
SETAREH LAW GROUP
9454 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 907
Beverly Hills, California 90212
T: (310) 888-7771 | F: (310) 888-0109
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JUAN PATINO
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
Tamara I. Devitt/Bar No. 209683
tamara.devitt@haynesboone.com
Kimberly A. Chase/Bar No. 253311
kimberly.chase@haynesboone.com
Matthew E. Costello/Bar No. 295062
matthew.costello@haynesboone.com
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 700
Costa Mesa, California 92626
T: (949) 202-3000 | F: (949) 202-3001
Attorneys for Defendants
KVS TRANSPORTATION, INC. and NABORS DRILLING USA, LP
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUAN PATINO, on behalf of himself, all
others similarly situated,
Case No. 1:15-CV-00713-TLN-SMS
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
KVS TRANSPORTATION, INC., a
)
California corporation; NABORS DRILLING )
USA, L.P., a Delaware corporation; and
)
)
DOES 1-50,
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Assigned to U.S. District Judge
Troy L. Nunley
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
DATE TO COMPLETE CURRENTLY
NOTICED DEPOSITIONS AND FOR
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT
WITNESSES
Complaint filed:
May 8, 2015
1
Joint Stipulation and Order to Continue Discovery
Cut-off Date to Complete Currently Noticed
Depositions and
for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
1
Plaintiff Juan Patino (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants KVS Transportation, Inc. (“KVS”)
2
and Nabors Drilling USA, LP (collectively, the “Parties”), through their respective counsel,
3
hereby stipulate as follows:
4
5
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2015, the Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order governing
discovery and other pretrial proceedings (Dkt. No. 14) (“Order”) for this case;
6
7
WHEREAS, the Order bifurcates discovery into two phases, with Phase I discovery
limited to facts that are relevant to whether this action should be certified as a class action;
8
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order, all Phase I discovery must be completed by the
9
Parties on or before January 29, 2016 and the Parties must disclose their respective expert
10
witnesses on or before February 29, 2016;
WHEREAS, on December 31, 2015, KVS noticed Plaintiff’s deposition for January 20,
11
12
13
14
15
16
2016;
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2016, Plaintiff served a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice on
KVS, with such deposition to be held on January 22, 2016;
WHEREAS, on January 12, 2016, Plaintiff’s counsel informed counsel for KVS that
Plaintiff was not available on the noticed date of January 20, 2016;
17
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2016, counsel for KVS informed Plaintiff’s counsel that
18
KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent and counsel for KVS were not available on the noticed date of
19
January 22, 2016, provided alternative dates for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition and asked for
20
alternative dates for Plaintiff’s deposition, and suggested to Plaintiff’s counsel that Plaintiff’s
21
deposition and the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition be scheduled for the same day;
22
WHEREAS, the Parties are in the process of meeting and conferring in good faith to
23
schedule the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, with
24
the aim of completing these depositions by the end of February 2016, subject to witness and
25
counsel availability;
26
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that good cause exists to continue the Phase I discovery
27
cut-off date (i) to complete the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule
28
2
Joint Stipulation and Order to Continue Discovery
Cut-off Date to Complete Currently Noticed
Depositions and
for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
1
30(b)(6) deponent only, and (ii) to disclose expert witnesses, if any, which may be necessary
2
following the depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent;
3
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that continuing the Phase I discovery cut-off by 60 days to
4
complete the currently outstanding depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent
5
and to disclose expert witnesses would promote efficiency and judicial economy, as it will allow
6
the Parties to engage in necessary pre-certification discovery; and
7
8
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that neither party will be prejudiced by the requested
continuance.
9
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby
10
stipulate, subject to this Court’s approval, that the deadline to complete Phase I discovery,
11
currently set for January 29, 2016, shall be continued to March 29, 2016 for purposes of (i)
12
completing the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and
13
(ii) disclosing expert witnesses.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Date: February 1, 2016
SETARAH LAW GROUP
By:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Date: February 1, 2016
/s/ Shaun Setarah
Shaun Setarah
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JUAN PATINO
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
By:
/s/ Matthew E. Costello
Matthew E. Costello
Attorneys for Defendants
KVS TRANSPORTATION, INC. and
NABORS DRILLING USA, LP
(as authorized on January 27, 2016
per L.R. 131(e))
26
27
28
3
Joint Stipulation and Order to Continue Discovery
Cut-off Date to Complete Currently Noticed
Depositions and
for Disclosure of Expert Witnesses
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, the deadline to complete Phase I discovery, currently
3
set for January 29, 2016, shall be continued to March 29, 2016 for purposes of (i) completing
4
the currently noticed depositions of Plaintiff and KVS’ Rule 30(b)(6) deponent, and (ii)
5
disclosing expert witnesses.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: February 1, 2016
9
10
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?