Epperson v. Oracle Corporation

Filing 27

ORDER re 26 December 23, 2016 Filing signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/6/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5

CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON,

6

Plaintiff,

7
8

1:15-cv-00724 LJO BAM
ORDER RE DECEMBER 23, 2016
FILING (Doc. 26).

v.
ORACLE CORPORATION,

9

Defendants.

10
11
12

On December 23, 2016, the Court received a one-page filling from Plaintiff that lists the above-

13 captioned case, among others. It is not clear what Plaintiff is requesting of the Court in relation to this
14 case, which has been closed for more than a year. The document lists several phrases that appear to
15 invoke legal concepts and/or legal citations. As the Court has no jurisdiction to act on this request,
16 which does not pertain to any pending cause of action and is not framed by any Federal Rule of Civil
17 Procedure, the filing will be disregarded. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the open motion
18 triggered by the filing of Document 26.
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

January 6, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
1