Washington v. Rough et al

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING 25 Defendants' Second Motion for an Extension of Time to Serve Responses to Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/28/2017. Responses due by 5/8/2017. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
JESSE WASHINGTON,
12
13
v.
14
15

Case No. 1:15-cv-00725-DAD-BAM (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
SECOND REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION
OF TIME TO SERVE RESPONSES TO
DISCOVERY

P. ROUCH, et al.,

16

(ECF No. 25)
Defendants.

17
Plaintiff Jesse Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18
19

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case currently proceeds on

20

Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference to his medical needs against

21

Defendants Rouch and Sisodia. This matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

22

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for a seven-day extension of time to allow

23
24

Defendants to respond to Plaintiff’s requests for production of documents, set one, filed on April

25

28, 2017. (ECF No. 25). In support, defense counsel declares that she is continuing to analyze

26

years of medical records and related documents to respond to Plaintiff’s requests, and requires

27

some additional time to receive the materials requested and finalize responses and a privilege log.

28

///
1

Good cause being presented, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request for an

1
2

extension of time to serve their responses to Plaintiff’s requests for production, filed April 28,

3

2017 (ECF No. 25), is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve their responses on or before May 8,

4

2017.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

April 28, 2017

8

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2