Kirkelie v. Thissell

Filing 56

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response to the Second Amended Complaint Within Ten Days From the Date of Service of This Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/31/17. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN KIRKELIE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. C.O. THISSELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:15-cv-00735-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER Plaintiff Jonathan Kirkelie is a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (“BOP”). On March 29, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to 19 20 Defendant Masterson and denied the motion as to Defendants Thissell, Madhavi, Knoll and Smith. 21 (ECF No. 45.) On April 3, 2017, the Court directed Defendants to file a response to the complaint 22 within ten days. (ECF No. 46.) On April 17, 2017, the Court granted Defendants request to extend 23 the time to file a response on June 12, 2017. (ECF No. 48.) 24 On May 26, 2017, Defendants filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 49.) 25 On June 13, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to stay the case pending resolution of 26 the appeal, and all deadlines were vacated to be rescheduled, if necessary, after resolution of the 27 appeal. (ECF No. 53.) 28 /// 1 On August 28, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Defendants’ (appellants’ 1 2 therein) motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. (ECF No. 55.) Inasmuch as the appeal has been dismissed, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Defendants to file a 3 4 response to the second amended complaint within ten (10) days from the date of service of this order. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: 8 August 31, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?