Kirkelie v. Thissell

Filing 8

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure to Comply With a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/16/15. Show Cause Response Due Within Twenty Days. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JONATHAN KIRKELIE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
C.O. THISSELL, et al.,

15

Defendant.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00735-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
[ECF No. 5]

Plaintiff Jonathan Kirkelie is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of

19

the United States Magistrate Judge on May 28, 2015. Local Rule 302.

20

On May 27, 2015, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiff’s complaint filed on May 15,

21

2015, for failure lack of a signature as required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 and Local Rule

22

131, and directed Plaintiff to file a signed complaint within thirty days or suffer dismissal of the

23

action. (ECF No. 5.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or

24

otherwise responded to the order.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

Accordingly, within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order Plaintiff shall show

1
2

cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. Local Rule

3

110. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action, without prejudice.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

7

July 16, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2