Carrasquilla et al v. Tulare County
Filing
31
ORDER re Stipulation of the Parties (Doc. 30) to Continue Expert Disclosure and Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadlines: (1.) The Deadline for Expert Disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2) shall be continued from July 1, 2016, to August 12, 2016; and (2.) The Deadline for Supplemental Expert Disclosures shall be continued from July 22, 2016, to September 2, 2016. (3.) All other dates remain as set in the Scheduling Order. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/15/2016. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600
Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
11
12 CARLOS CARRASQUILLA, ALBA
LYDA CARRASQUILLA,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
TULARE COUNTY, DOES 1-10,
16 Inclusive,
17
18
19
20
Defendants.
Case No. 1:15-CV-00740--BAM
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES
TO CONTINUE EXPERT
DISCLOSURE AND
SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT
DISCLOSURE DEADLINES
Filed Concurrently with Stipulation of
the Parties to Continue Expert
Disclosure and Supplemental Expert
Disclosure Deadlines
The Hon. Magistrate Barbara A.
McAuliffe
Trial Date:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
March 14, 2017
1
TO ALL PARTIES:
2
The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties to Continue Expert
3 Disclosure and Supplemental Expert Disclosure Deadlines (Doc. 30), and finds good
4 cause thereby. The Scheduling Order shall be modified as follows:
5
1.
6
7
continued from July 1, 2016, to August 12, 2016; and
2.
8
9
The Deadline for Expert Disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2) shall be
The Deadline for Supplemental Expert Disclosures shall be continued
from July 22, 2016, to September 2, 2016.
3.
All other dates remain as set in the Scheduling Order.
21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600
Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED
12 Dated:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
June 15, 2016
/s/
Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?