Carrasquilla et al v. Tulare County

Filing 33

ORDER (re Doc. 32 Stipulation): (1.) The deadline for expert disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(2) on the issue of neurology only shall be continued from August 12, 2016, to September 12, 2016; and (2.) The deadline for rebuttal/supplemental expert reports on the issue ofneurology only shall be continued from September 2, 2016, to October3, 2016; (3.) All other dates and deadlines remain unchanged. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/16/2016. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 CARLOS CARRASQUILLA, ALBA 14 LYDA CARRASQUILLA, Plaintiff, 15 16 Case No. 1:15-CV-00740-BAM [PROPOSED] ORDER Filed Concurrently with Proposed Order v. 17 TULARE COUNTY, DOES 1-10, Inclusive, 18 Defendant. 19 The Hon. Magistrate Barbara A. McAuliffe Trial Date: None Set 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO ALL PARTIES: The Parties, having requested by way of stipulation that this Court issue an order granting a limited continuance of expert disclosure and rebuttal/supplemental report deadlines on the issue of neurology, and for good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The deadline for expert disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(2) on the issue of neurology only shall be continued from August Case No. 1:15-CV-00740--BAM [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 12, 2016, to September 12, 2016; and 2. The deadline for rebuttal/supplemental expert reports on the issue of 3 neurology only shall be continued from September 2, 2016, to October 4 3, 2016; 5 3. All other dates and deadlines remain unchanged. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: August 16, 2016 21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600 Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?