Carrasquilla et al v. Tulare County
Filing
33
ORDER (re Doc. 32 Stipulation): (1.) The deadline for expert disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(a)(2) on the issue of neurology only shall be continued from August 12, 2016, to September 12, 2016; and (2.) The deadline for rebuttal/supplemental expert reports on the issue ofneurology only shall be continued from September 2, 2016, to October3, 2016; (3.) All other dates and deadlines remain unchanged. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/16/2016. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
CARLOS CARRASQUILLA, ALBA
14 LYDA CARRASQUILLA,
Plaintiff,
15
16
Case No. 1:15-CV-00740-BAM
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Filed Concurrently with Proposed Order
v.
17 TULARE COUNTY, DOES 1-10,
Inclusive,
18
Defendant.
19
The Hon. Magistrate Barbara A.
McAuliffe
Trial Date:
None Set
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO ALL PARTIES:
The Parties, having requested by way of stipulation that this Court issue an
order granting a limited continuance of expert disclosure and rebuttal/supplemental
report deadlines on the issue of neurology, and for good cause appearing, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
The deadline for expert disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc.
26(a)(2) on the issue of neurology only shall be continued from August
Case No. 1:15-CV-00740--BAM
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
12, 2016, to September 12, 2016; and
2.
The deadline for rebuttal/supplemental expert reports on the issue of
3
neurology only shall be continued from September 2, 2016, to October
4
3, 2016;
5
3.
All other dates and deadlines remain unchanged.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9 Dated: August 16, 2016
21600 Oxnard Street, Suite 600
Woodland Hills, California 91367-4903
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?