Carrasquilla et al v. Tulare County
Filing
67
ORDER DISMISSING Action With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/20/17. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION
12
13
CARLOS CARRASQUILLA, ALBA
14 LYDA CARRASQUILLA,
Plaintiff,
15
16
v.
17 TULARE COUNTY, DOES 1-10,
Inclusive,
18
Defendant.
19
Case No. 1:15-CV-00740--BAM
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
The Hon. Magistrate Barbara A.
McAuliffe
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties seeking dismissal of this
entire action with prejudice. Based on the Parties’ stipulation, a Full Release of All
Claims Agreement (“Release”) has been reached and executed by all Parties. The
stipulation affirms that the Release was entered into by the Parties in good faith, and the
settlement has now been consummated. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) dismissal
pursuant to the Parties’ voluntary stipulation is appropriate, and the Court finds good
cause to enter an order of dismissal.
Case No. 1:15-CV-00740--BAM
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
1
The Court ORDERS as follows:
2
1.
This entire action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice;
3
2.
The Parties shall bear their own costs;
4
3.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction for the limited purpose of enforcing the
5
6
terms of the Release, if necessary; and
4.
7
8
This dismissal constitutes the final judgment on this matter and the matter
is now CLOSED.
5.
The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12 Dated: April 20, 2017
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?