AquAlliance et al v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER to Continue Settlement Conference Meeting and Extend Time to Lodge CEQA Record. (Settlement Conference for June 26, 2015, shall be continued to July 14, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. at the offices of Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, located at 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor,Sacramento, California 95814. CEQA administrative record identified in California Public Resources Code section 21167.6(b) is extended to September 21, 2015.) signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/30/2015. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DANIEL J. O’HANLON, State Bar No. 122380 HANSPETER WALTER, State Bar No. 244847 REBECCA R. AKROYD, State Bar No. 267305 KRONICK, MOSKOVITZ, TIEDEMANN & GIRARD A Professional Corporation 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 321-4500 Facsimile: (916) 321-4555 ANDREA A. MATARAZZO, State Bar No. 179198 JEFFREY K. DORSO, State Bar No. 219379 PIONEER LAW GROUP, LLP 1122 S Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916) 287-9500 Facsimile: (916) 287-9515 JON D. RUBIN, State Bar No. 196944 General Counsel SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 321-4519 Facsimile: (209) 826-9698 Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 18 19 20 AQUALLIANCE; CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE; CENTRAL DELTA WATER AGENCY; SOUTH DELTA WATER AGENCY; LOCAL AGENCIES OF THE NORTH DELTA, 21 Petitioners/Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:15-cv-00754 LJO BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT MEETING AND EXTEND TIME TO LODGE CEQA RECORD vs. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21167.6, 21167.8) The UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION; SAN LUIS & DELTAMENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY; SALLY JEWEL, in her capacity; and DOES 1- 100, DATE: July 14, 2015 TIME: 11:00 a.m. LOCATION: 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 22 23 24 25 26 Date Action Filed: May 11, 2015 Respondents/Defendants, 27 28 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 1 The undersigned parties, by their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 2 1. The settlement meeting pursuant to California Public Resources Code section 21167.8 3 presently scheduled for June 26, 2015, shall be continued to July 14, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. at the 4 offices of Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard, located at 400 Capitol Mall, 27th Floor, 5 Sacramento, California 95814. 6 2. The Petition and Complaint on file in the above-referenced action alleges violations 7 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code sections 21000 et 8 seq. by Respondent/Defendant San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (“Authority”). 9 3. The Petition and Complaint was filed on May 11, 2015, and served on 10 Respondent/Defendant Authority on May 20, 2015, along with Petitioners/Plaintiffs’ “notice of 11 election” to prepare the CEQA record of administrative proceedings under California Public 12 Resources Code section 21167.6(a). 13 4. The Petition and Complaint on file in the above-referenced action also alleges 14 violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. sections 4321 et seq. by 15 Respondent/Defendant U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. 16 5. To avoid unnecessary duplication and confusion, the federal record of NEPA 17 proceedings currently in preparation by Respondent/Defendant U.S. Bureau of Reclamation should 18 be completed and lodged with the court prior to the parties certifying and lodging the CEQA 19 record. As a result, the CEQA record cannot be certified and lodged with the Court within the 60- 20 day period identified in California Public Resources Code section 21167.6(b). California Public 21 Resources Code section 21167.6(c) provides that a court may extend that period upon stipulation 22 of all parties. 23 6. If and to the extent it applies to proceedings in this Court, then the time for certifying 24 and lodging the CEQA administrative record identified in California Public Resources Code 25 section 21167.6(b) is extended to September 21, 2015. 26 7. The petitions/complaints and answers shall serve as the parties’ respective statements 27 of issues under California Public Resources Code section 21167.8(f), if and to the extent it applies 28 in the above-referenced action. 8. Nothing in this stipulation constitutes evidence of agreement or consent regarding the 1 substantive issues in this case. 2 DATE: June 25, 2015 KRONICK MOSKOVITZ TIEDEMANN & GIRARD 3 4 By: 5 6 7 8 DATE: June 29, 2015 /s/ Daniel J. O’Hanlon DANIEL J. O’HANLON Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY PIONEER LAW GROUP, LLP 9 By: 10 11 12 /s/ Andrea A. Matarazzo ANDREA A. MATARAZZO Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY 13 14 DATE: June 29, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMNET OF JUSTICE 15 By: 16 17 /s/ Anna K. Stimmel (as authorized on 6/29/15) ANNA K. STIMMEL Attorneys for Respondent/Defendant U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 18 19 DATE: June 24, 2015 AQUA TERRA AERIS LAW GROUP 20 21 By: 22 23 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// /s/ Jason R. Flanders JASON R. FLANDERS Attorneys for Petitioners/Plaintiffs AQUALLIANCE and CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 1 DATE: June 29, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL B. JACKSON 2 By: /s/ Michael B. Jackson (as authorized on 6/26/15) MICHAEL B. JACKSON Attorneys for Petitioners/Plaintiffs AQUALLIANCE and CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 3 4 5 6 DATE: June 29, 2015 SOLURI MESERVE, A LAW CORPORATION 7 8 By: 9 10 11 /s/ Osha R. Meserve OSHA R. MESERVE Attorneys for Petitioners/Plaintiffs LOCAL AGENCIES OF THE NORTH DELTA, CENTRAL DELTA WATER AGENCY, SOUTH DELTA WATER AGENCY 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 30, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE _

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?