Pullett v. Castellanos et al

Filing 19

ORDER DENYING 18 Motion signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 12/8/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DELL PULLETT,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00755-RRB
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION AT DOCKET 18
vs.
J. CASTELLANOS, et al.,
Defendants.

At Docket 18 Plaintiff Dell Pullett has filed a Motion for In Camera Review
requesting that the Court order Defendants to produce certain information: (1) a Crime
Incident Report dated May 13, 2013; and (2) the names of the two “John Doe” correctional
officers who were working the in Facility-D, Building 5, second-watch on the day of the
incident.
At this stage of the proceeding, because no party has appeared upon which such
an order can be served, the Court is unable to grant Pullett the relief requested.
Furthermore, the information requested is unnecessary for the purposes of complying with
the Court’s Order directing Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint.1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for In Camera Review at Docket 18 is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2015
S/ RALPH R. BEISTLINE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

See Dismissal Order, Docket 13, pp. 10–11.