McCoy v. Holguin et al
Filing
117
ORDER GRANTING 113 Defendants' Motion for a Continuance of the Trial Date signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 11/5/2019. Jury Trial RESET for 5/19/2020 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAKEITH L. MCCOY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
A. HOLGUIN, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:15-cv-00768-DAD-JDP
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE
TRIAL DATE
ECF No. 113
Trial continued to May 19, 2020, at 1 p.m.
16
17
18
Defendants’ motion to continue the trial date until after plaintiff’s criminal trial, ECF No.
19
113, is granted. The trial date is continued until May 19, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. (Defendants
20
requested May 18, but the court is unavailable on that date.)
21
The court grants this continuance reluctantly and does not anticipate further continuances.
22
While I appreciate defendants’ arguments about the benefits of delaying the civil trial until after
23
the related criminal trial, the defendants represent that the criminal trial has already been delayed
24
“numerous times.” ECF No. 113 at 1. By the time of the new trial date, this civil case will be
25
almost five years old. See ECF No. 1 (filed May 20, 2015). The civil trial cannot be held hostage
26
to indefinite delays on the criminal side. Should the related criminal trial be postponed further,
27
defendants are to notify the court of that delay immediately.
28
1
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated:
4
November 5, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
No. 205
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?