McCoy v. Holguin et al

Filing 173

ORDER DENYING 170 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 11/23/2021. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAKEITH MCCOY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-768-DAD-HBK ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS v. (Doc. No. 170) A. HOLGUIN, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions filed November 19, 2021. 18 (Doc. No. 170). Plaintiff requests unspecified sanctions in relation to a prior settlement 19 conference conducted by the undersigned via Zoom. (Id. at 1). Plaintiff states he never saw 20 defendants on the Zoom call and therefore posits Defendants did not participate in good faith to 21 settle the case. (Id. at 3). 22 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, is currently incarcerated at Kern Valley State Prison 23 and proceeding on his Second Amended Complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 raising Eighth 24 Amendment violations stemming from an alleged excessive use of force and failure to intervene 25 claims. (Doc. No. 15). The undersigned conducted a Zoom settlement conference on February 26 26, 2021. (See Doc. No. 142). Both Plaintiff and Defendants appeared by Zoom. (Id.). 27 Although Plaintiff may not have seen Defendants on the Zoom video conference, as explained by 28 the undersigned during the introductory explanation, separate caucusing in separate Zoom rooms 1 during settlement conferences is common practice depending on the facts and circumstances of 2 each case. Therefore, the sanctions Plaintiff seeks against Defendants in this case in relation to 3 the February 26, 2021 settlement conference is not appropriate here. See Manago v. Davey, 2018 4 WL 6788041 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2018) (denying a plaintiff’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions in 5 relation to a settlement conference). 6 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 7 Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (Doc. No. 170) is DENIED. 8 9 10 Dated: November 23, 2021 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?