McCoy v. Holguin et al
Filing
185
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Redact Previously-Filed Document. ORDER directing Clerk to Redact, Restrict Access, or otherwise Seal Document 34-3, Page 74 179 signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 6/28/2022. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAKEITH L. MCCOY,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
A. HOLGUIN, C. CASILLAS, D. KING,
V. MOORE, J. GONZALES, A.
MARTINEZ, S. LOMAS, O. DELGADO,
E. BARRON, FNU MONTANEZ; FNY
MAYFIELD, FNU MORENO, C.
MARTINEZ, G. ARELLANO, HOLLIS
BENNET,,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00768-DAD-HBK (PC)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO REDACT PREVIOUSLY FILED
DOCUMENT
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REDACT,
RESTRICT ACCESS, OR OTHERWISE
SEAL DOC. 34-3, PAGE 74
(Doc. No. 179)
Defendants.
19
20
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to redact previously-filed document and
21
supporting memorandum of points and authorities, filed on February 9, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 179,
22
179-1). The Court grants the motion.
23
Defendants note that when they filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s discovery motion on
24
August 26, 2016, they inadvertently filed discovery related documents that contained personal
25
identifying information for Plaintiff, including a social security number and his date of birth in a
26
probable cause declaration. (Doc. No. 179-1 at 1-2). Defendants note that Federal Rule of Civil
27
Procedure 5.2 directs parties not to file documents containing social security numbers and full
28
birthdates. (Id.). Because Defendants inadvertently filed documents containing private
1
information for Plaintiff, Defendants request the Court direct the Clerk to redact page 74 of
2
docket entry 34-3 so the private information is not available on the public docket. (Id.at 1-2).
3
Rule 5.2 governs privacy protections for court filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2. Local Rule
4
140 also provides direction on private data, redactions and sealing. See Local Rule 140 (E.D. Cal.
5
2022). A document containing a social security number or birthdate should be redacted before
6
filing unless otherwise ordered by the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 (a); Local Rule 140(a)(i). Local
7
140(b) permits redactions by court order.
8
9
As Defendants recognize, they must comply with Rule 5.2 and Local Rule 140 before
filing documents with the Court. The Court recognizes this time was an inadvertent oversight and
10
will request the Clerk’s assistance. Plaintiff’s social security number and birthdate are not
11
relevant for purposes of ruling on any matters in this case, but this private information is currently
12
available on a public docket. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk to redact, seal, or
13
otherwise restrict public access to docket entry 34-3 at page 74.
14
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
15
1. Defendant’s motion to redact previously filed private information (Doc. No. 179) is
16
GRANTED.
17
18
2. The Clerk of Court shall redact, seal, or otherwise restrict public access to Doc. No.
34-3 at page 74 containing Plaintiff’s private information.
19
20
21
Dated:
June 28, 2022
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?