McCoy v. Holguin et al

Filing 185

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Redact Previously-Filed Document. ORDER directing Clerk to Redact, Restrict Access, or otherwise Seal Document 34-3, Page 74 179 signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 6/28/2022. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAKEITH L. MCCOY, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. A. HOLGUIN, C. CASILLAS, D. KING, V. MOORE, J. GONZALES, A. MARTINEZ, S. LOMAS, O. DELGADO, E. BARRON, FNU MONTANEZ; FNY MAYFIELD, FNU MORENO, C. MARTINEZ, G. ARELLANO, HOLLIS BENNET,, Case No. 1:15-cv-00768-DAD-HBK (PC) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REDACT PREVIOUSLY FILED DOCUMENT ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REDACT, RESTRICT ACCESS, OR OTHERWISE SEAL DOC. 34-3, PAGE 74 (Doc. No. 179) Defendants. 19 20 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to redact previously-filed document and 21 supporting memorandum of points and authorities, filed on February 9, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 179, 22 179-1). The Court grants the motion. 23 Defendants note that when they filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s discovery motion on 24 August 26, 2016, they inadvertently filed discovery related documents that contained personal 25 identifying information for Plaintiff, including a social security number and his date of birth in a 26 probable cause declaration. (Doc. No. 179-1 at 1-2). Defendants note that Federal Rule of Civil 27 Procedure 5.2 directs parties not to file documents containing social security numbers and full 28 birthdates. (Id.). Because Defendants inadvertently filed documents containing private 1 information for Plaintiff, Defendants request the Court direct the Clerk to redact page 74 of 2 docket entry 34-3 so the private information is not available on the public docket. (Id.at 1-2). 3 Rule 5.2 governs privacy protections for court filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2. Local Rule 4 140 also provides direction on private data, redactions and sealing. See Local Rule 140 (E.D. Cal. 5 2022). A document containing a social security number or birthdate should be redacted before 6 filing unless otherwise ordered by the court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 (a); Local Rule 140(a)(i). Local 7 140(b) permits redactions by court order. 8 9 As Defendants recognize, they must comply with Rule 5.2 and Local Rule 140 before filing documents with the Court. The Court recognizes this time was an inadvertent oversight and 10 will request the Clerk’s assistance. Plaintiff’s social security number and birthdate are not 11 relevant for purposes of ruling on any matters in this case, but this private information is currently 12 available on a public docket. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk to redact, seal, or 13 otherwise restrict public access to docket entry 34-3 at page 74. 14 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 15 1. Defendant’s motion to redact previously filed private information (Doc. No. 179) is 16 GRANTED. 17 18 2. The Clerk of Court shall redact, seal, or otherwise restrict public access to Doc. No. 34-3 at page 74 containing Plaintiff’s private information. 19 20 21 Dated: June 28, 2022 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?