McCoy v. Holguin et al
Filing
224
AMENDED ORDER Setting Trial Date, Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing and Related Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 03/25/2024. Defendants' Amended Pretrial Statement Deadline: 4/19/2024. Trial set for 7/16/2024 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (KES) before District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff. Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 5/13/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (KES) before District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff. (Maldonado, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAKEITH MCCOY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
HOLGUIN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No. 1:15-cv-00768-KES-HBK (PC)
AMENDED ORDER SETTING TRIAL
DATE, TELEPHONIC TRIAL
CONFIRMATION HEARING AND
RELATED DEADLINES1
Defendants’ Amended Pretrial Statement:
April 19, 2024
Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing:
May 13, 2024 at 1:30 p.m.
17
Trial Date: July 16, 2024 at 8:30 AM
18
On December 22, 2023, the pretrial conference and trial dates were vacated due to the
19
20
previously assigned district judge’s elevation to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Doc. No.
21
222). On March 14, 2024, this case was reassigned to Judge Kirk E. Sheriff. (Doc. No. 223).
22
The District Court now resets this matter for trial before Judge Kirk E. Sheriff to occur on July
23
16, 2024 at 8:30 a.m., and a telephonic trial confirmation hearing before Judge Sheriff to occur
24
on May 13, 2024, at 1:30 p.m.
25
////
26
////
27
The Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing (“TTCH”) is also known as a pretrial conference. The
TTCH will function as a pretrial conference for this action. See Local Rules 280, 282.
1
28
1
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS
2
3
1. The parties were previously directed to file amended separate pretrial statements
consistent with Local Rules 281(a)(1) and 281(b). (See Doc. No. 218).
4
2. Plaintiff filed an amended pretrial statement on December 11, 2023. (Doc. No. 220).
5
3. Defendants shall file and serve their amended pretrial statements on or before April 19,
6
2024.
7
8
9
TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING
1. A Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is set for May 13, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. The
location of the conference, including whether it will be held digitally or in person, will be
10
communicated to the parties by Judge Sheriff. If set digitally, the parties will be provided with
11
the Zoom ID and password by Judge Sheriff’s Courtroom Deputy prior to the conference. The
12
Zoom ID number and password are confidential and are not to be shared. Appropriate court attire
13
is required.
14
2. Counsel for Defendants is required to contact Plaintiff’s institution to arrange for
15
Plaintiff’s participation at the TTCH as soon as the Court determines whether the conference will
16
be remotely or in person.
17
18
ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES FOR TRIAL
1. As previously advise, at the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce
19
evidence to prove each of the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In
20
general, there are two kinds of trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is
21
Plaintiff’s responsibility to produce all the evidence to prove Plaintiff’s case, whether that
22
evidence is in the form of exhibits or witness testimony. In addition to the matters already
23
required to be addressed in the pretrial statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff
24
must make a particularized showing to obtain the attendance of inmate-witnesses. The
25
procedures and requirements for arranging witnesses is detailed below. Plaintiff is advised that
26
failure to comply with these procedures may result in the preclusion of any or all witnesses
27
named in Plaintiff’s pretrial statement. To call witnesses to testify, Plaintiff must follow the
28
procedures set forth below:
2
1
Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Voluntarily Testify
2
2. An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot
3
come to court unless this Court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the incarcerated
4
witness to be transported to court. This Court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied
5
that: (a) the prospective witness is willing to attend; and (b) the prospective witness has actual
6
knowledge of relevant facts.
7
3. Either party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have
8
agreed to voluntarily attend the trial must serve and file a written motion for a court order
9
requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion must: (1) state
10
the name, address, and prison identification number of each witness; and (2) be accompanied by
11
declarations showing that each witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual
12
knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be entitled “Motion for Attendance of
13
Incarcerated Witnesses.”
14
4. The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) can
15
swear personally by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has
16
information that the witness is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed. In the
17
declaration, the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed him of this
18
willingness; or (2) the prospective witness can sign a declaration under penalty of perjury in
19
which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed.
20
5. The prospective incarcerated witnesses’ actual knowledge of relevant facts can be
21
shown in one of two ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective
22
witness was an eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts, the party can swear by
23
declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge (e.g., if an
24
incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell and, at the time, the party saw that a cellmate was present and
25
observed the incident, the party may swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify); or (2) the inmate-
26
witness can sign a declaration under penalty of perjury in which the inmate-witness describes
27
the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye or ear witness. Whether the
28
declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the
3
1
incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness
2
happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred. The party
3
must serve and file the declaration made the inmate-witness or by himself.
4
Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify Voluntarily
5
6. If a party wishes to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who refuse to
6
testify voluntarily, the party should serve and file a written motion for a court order requiring that
7
such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. Such motion should be in the form
8
described above. In addition, the party must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses
9
are not willing to testify voluntarily.
10
7. The Court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses,
11
specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the Court will
12
issue the writs necessary to cause the witnesses’ custodian to bring the witnesses to court.
13
14
8. A motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or
before April 19, 2024. An opposition(s), if any, must be filed on or before May 3, 2024.
15
Nonincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to Voluntarily Testify
16
9. It is the responsibility of either party who has secured a nonincarcerated witnesses’
17
voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial. No action need be sought
18
or obtained from the Court.
19
Nonincarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to Testify Voluntarily
20
10. If a prospective witness is not incarcerated, and he or she refuses to testify
21
voluntarily, the witness must be served with a subpoena. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. In addition, the
22
party must tender an appropriate sum of money for the witness. Id. In the case of an
23
nonincarcerated witness, the appropriate sum of money is the daily witness fee of $40.00 plus the
24
witnesses’ travel expenses. 28 U.S.C. § 1821.
25
11. If Plaintiff wishes to obtain the attendance of one or more nonincarcerated witnesses,
26
who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must first notify the Court in writing of the name and
27
location of each nonincarcerated witness. The Court will calculate the travel expense for each
28
nonincarcerated witness and notify Plaintiff of the amount(s). Plaintiff then, for each witness,
4
1
must submit a money order made payable to the witness for the full amount of the witnesses’
2
travel expenses plus the daily witness fee of $40.00. The subpoena will not be served upon the
3
nonincarcerated witness by the United States Marshals Service unless the money order is tendered
4
to the Court. Because no statute authorizes the use of public funds for these expenses in civil
5
cases, the tendering of witness fees and travel expenses is required even if Plaintiff was granted
6
leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff wishes to have the Marshals Service serve any
7
nonincarcerated witnesses who refuse to testify voluntarily, Plaintiff must submit the money
8
orders to the Court no later than May 10, 2024. To ensure timely submission of the money
9
orders, Plaintiff must notify the Court of the names and locations of his or her witnesses, in
10
compliance with the instructions above, no later than April 19, 2024.
11
CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE IS AVAILABLE
12
District Court Judges of the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California have
13
among the heaviest caseloads in the nation. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the backlog
14
and as a result trial for a District Judge cannot occur until the date set above. The parties can
15
consent to a United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings, including trial and entry
16
of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, and Local
17
Rule 305. The Eastern District Magistrate Judges, all experienced in trial, use the same jury pool
18
and same court facilities as United States District Court Judges. Since Magistrate Judges do not
19
conduct felony trials, they have greater flexibility and schedule firm trial dates. Judgment entered
20
by a United States Magistrate Judge is appealable directly to the United States Court of Appeal
21
for the Ninth Circuit. While there are scheduling benefits to consenting to Magistrate Judge
22
jurisdiction, substantive rulings and decisions will not be affected by whether a party chooses to
23
consent or not. The possibility of consenting may be addressed by the District Judge at the
24
TTCH.
25
26
EFFECT OF THIS ORDER
•
27
28
Any party unable to comply with the dates outlined in this order shall immediately file an
appropriate motion or stipulation identifying the requested modification(s).
•
The dates set in this order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
5
1
showing of good cause, even if a stipulation to modify is filed. Due to the impacted
2
nature of the civil case docket, this Court disfavors requests to modify established dates.
3
•
The parties are advised that failure to file amended pretrial statements as required by this
4
Order or failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of appropriate
5
sanctions, which may include dismissal of the action or entry of default.
6
7
Dated:
March 25, 2024
HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?