Madrid v. Pease et al
ORDER Adopting 18 Findings and Recommendations, Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants for the Failure to State a Cognizable Claim, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/24/17. John Madrid, Mitsy McCallum, J.D. McCamey, C.L. Miller, J.C. Black and S. Daley terminated. (Gonzalez, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 1:15-cv-00770-LJO-BAM-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, (ECF No. 18),
DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS FOR THE FAILURE TO
STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM
P. PEASE, et al.,
Plaintiff John Madrid is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States
20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 13, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that this
22 action proceed on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Pease, Mendez,
23 Burnes, Thatcher, Aguerralde, and Sauceda for excessive force in violation of the Eighth
24 Amendment, and that the remaining claims and defendants be dismissed from this action for
25 Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 18.) The
26 Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any
27 objections must be filed within thirty days after service of the order. (Id. at 9.) The deadline for
28 any objections has expired, and no objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted
2 a de novo review of this case and carefully reviewed the entire file. The Court finds that the
3 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
adopted in full;
The Findings and Recommendations dated June 13, 2017 (ECF No. 18) are
This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed on July 21,
2017, against Defendants Pease, Mendez, Burnes, Thatcher, Aguerralde, and
Sauceda for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment;
failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted; and
All other claims and defendants are dismissed from this action based on Plaintiff’s
This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for proceedings
consistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
July 24, 2017
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?