Madrid v. Pease et al
Filing
44
ORDER Vacating Hearings and Deadlines; ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case Pursuant to Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal, With Prejudice 43 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/23/2018. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
JOHN MADRID,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
v.
P. PEASE, et al.,
Defendants.
20
ORDER VACATING HEARINGS AND
DEADLINES
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
CLOSE CASE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION
FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, WITH
PREJUDICE
(Doc. No. 43)
18
19
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00770-LJO-BAM (PC)
Plaintiff John Madrid is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
21
On April 20, 2018, defense counsel filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal, with prejudice,
22
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. No. 88.) The stipulation is signed
23
and dated by Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants J. Burnes, T. Thatcher, J. Mendez, R. Sauceda, J.
24
Aguerralde, and P. Pease, indicating that the case has been resolved in its entirety, and that each side
25
shall bear their own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
26
Considering the parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by
27
operation of law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party
28
shall bear his or her own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. This matter had previously been set for a
1
1
settlement conference on July 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 42.) That conference is now vacated. The Clerk of
2
the Court is also directed to terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close this case.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
April 23, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?