Caruso v. Johnson et al

Filing 222

ORDER on 220 Stipulation to Amend Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/18/2019. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 GINA CARUSO Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 OFFICER G. SOLORIO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:15-cv-00780-AWI-EPG (PC) ORDER ON STIPULATION TO AMEND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 212) (ECF No. 220) 16 On December 17, 2019, the parties filed a Stipulation to Amend the Order on Plaintiff’s 17 18 Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 212). (ECF No. 220). Based upon the stipulation filed by the 19 parties, the Court hereby orders that the order for sanctions, filed on November 26, 2019 (ECF 20 No. 212) shall be amended as follows: 21 1. Page 13, line 12: “Defendant Villegas” will be changed to “Defendant Ingram”; 22 2. Page 13, line 14: “Defendant Villegas” will be changed to “Defendant Ingram”; 23 3. Page 14, line 18: “Defendant Villegas” will be changed to “Defendant Ingram”; 24 4. Page 14, line 20: “Defendant Villegas” will be changed to “Defendant Ingram”; and 25 5. Page 15, line 3: “Defendant Villegas” will be changed to “Defendant Ingram”. 26 27 /// /// 28 ORDER – STIPULATION TO AMEND ORDER FOR SANCTIONS CARUSO V. SOLORIO, ET AL., CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00780-AWI-EPG PAGE 1 1 An amended order with only the above changes will be issued in due course. 2 Defendants’ request for reconsideration by the District Judge (ECF No. 214) will be considered a 3 request for reconsideration of the amended order. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: December 18, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER – STIPULATION TO AMEND ORDER FOR SANCTIONS CARUSO V. SOLORIO, ET AL., CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00780-AWI-EPG PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?