Arthurs v. City of Bakersfield

Filing 15

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/14/2015. Pleading Amendment Deadline 2/26/2016. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 10/30/2015; Non-Expert 6/30/2016; Expert 9/9/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conference se t for 3/24/2016 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 9/30/2016; Hearing by 10/28/2016. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 11/18/2016; Hear ing by 12/28/2016. Pretrial Conference set for 1/30/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Jury Trial set for 3/14/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JONATHAN ARTHURS,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:15-CV-0788- JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 2/26/2016
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 10/30/2015
Non-Expert: 6/30/2016
Expert: 9/9/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
3/24/2016 at 9:00 a.m.

17
18

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 9/30/2016
Hearing: 10/28/2016

19
20
21

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 11/18/2016
Hearing: 12/28/2016

22
23

Pre-Trial Conference:
1/30/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

24
25

Trial: 3/14/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
Jury trial: 4 days

26
27
28
1

1

I.

September 14, 2015.

2
3

Date of Scheduling Conference

II.

Appearances of Counsel

4

Randall Rumph appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.

5

John Szewczyk appeared on behalf of Defendant.

6

III.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

7
8

motion to amend, no later than February 26, 2016.

9

IV.

10
11
12
13
14

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before October 30, 2015.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before June
30, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before September 9, 2016.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or July 29, 2016, and to

15

disclose all rebuttal experts on or before August 12, 2016. The written designation of retained and

16

non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and

17

shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with

18

this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such

19

experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

20

The written designation of retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R.

21

Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to

22

designate experts in compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other

23

evidence offered through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.

24

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

25

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

26

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

27

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.

28

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party’s duty to timely supplement
2

1

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for March 24, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. before the

2
3

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge, at the United States District

4

Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status

5

Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in

6

CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference and shall be e-mailed, in Word format to,

7

[e-mail]. The statement SHALL set forth the discovery completed to date, that

8

which is still outstanding and whether there is any impediment to completing discovery within the

9

assigned deadlines. Counsel may appear by telephone via the CourtCall service.

10
11

V.

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

12

than September 30, 2016, and heard on or before October 28, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are

13

heard at 9:00 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California, before the

14

Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

15

No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned

16

Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good

17

faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the

18

moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate

19

Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the

20

court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,

21

Susan Hall at [phone] or via email at [e-mail]. Counsel must comply with

22

Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice

23

and dropped from calendar.

24

In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening

25

time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the

26

notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.

27

Counsel may appear by telephone via the CourtCall service.

28

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than November 18, 2016, and heard no
3

1

later than December 28, 2016, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate

2

Judge, at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. In scheduling such motions,

3

counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rules 230 and 260.

4

VI.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

5

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

6

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

7

to be raised in the motion.
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where

8
9

a question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in

10

whole or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4)

11

narrow the issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties

12

incur the expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of

13

undisputed facts.

14

The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

15

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement

16

of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may

17

be deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the

18

joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as

19
20

ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

21

VII.

22
23
24

Pre-Trial Conference Date
January 30, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,

California before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

25

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

26

directly to Judge Thurston’s chambers, by email at [e-mail].

27
28

Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
4

1

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

2

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

3

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

4

VIII. Trial Date
March 14, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. at the United States District Courthouse in Bakersfield,

5
6

California, before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge.

7

A.

This is a jury trial.

8

B.

Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 4-6 days.

9

C.

Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

10

California, Rule 285.

11

IX.

Settlement Conference
If the parties believe the matter is in a settlement posture and desire a settlement conference,

12
13

they may file a joint request that the Court schedule a settlement conference.

14

X.

Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other Techniques to Shorten

15

Trial

16

Not applicable at this time.

17

XI.

There are no pending related matters.

18
19
20

Related Matters Pending

XII.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

21

and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any

22

amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules to efficiently handle its

23

increasing case load, and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil

24

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

25

XIII. Effect of this Order

26

The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

27

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

28

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
5

1

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

2

subsequent status conference.

3

The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a

4

showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations

5

extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by

6

affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause

7

for granting the relief requested.

8

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

September 14, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6